articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/201116-upstream-firms-ride-an-inevitable-m-a-wave-amid-industry-pressure-11738999 content esgSubNav
In This List

Upstream Firms Ride An Inevitable M&A Wave Amid Industry Pressure


Credit FAQ: How Do Ineos Group Holdings' Second-Quarter Results Affect Our View Of The Group's Credit Quality?


Eastern European Utilities' Regulatory Frameworks Are Varied, But Most Are Adequate To Strong


Germany's Green Energy Ambitions Spark A Transformative Decade For Utilities


Step Up Transformers: How Will North American Power Producers Adapt To An Evolving Grid?

Upstream Firms Ride An Inevitable M&A Wave Amid Industry Pressure

What's Driving E&P Consolidation?

Shale's merry-go-round outspending began to break down toward the end of 2019 as investors lost their patience and the promise of free cash flow return never came to fruition. After the March 2020 oil and natural gas price collapse, shale's high decline rates, and dismal cash returns, we foresee high reinvestment risk. Companies are running out of tier 1 acreage, and their limited capital resources with investors have been burned one too many times. Moreover, improved synergies through lower overhead and cash costs look increasingly attractive as exploration and production (E&P) teams focus more on cost take-out.

Some companies have taken massive write-downs this year as they re-evaluate their long-term price outlooks. This increases the risks of stranded assets, lower proved reserves, and the long-term viability of certain basins should this price environment remain:

  • Royal Dutch Shell PLC's impairment of $16.8 billion post-tax in the second quarter reduced average assets employed 6%.
  • BP PLC announced an impairment of up to $17 billion post-tax on a reduction in the company's long-term oil price to $55 per barrel.
  • Chevron Corp.'s impairments of $4.8 billion include a $2.6 billion write-off of its Venezuelan assets.
  • Although Exxon Mobil Corp. has not taken any material impairments thus far, the company indicated it is reviewing development plans for its North American dry gas assets, putting up $25 million-$30 billion of asset value at risk of impairment.

While a longer-term factor, this comes during an inevitable transition to renewables as investors embrace environmental, social, and governance factors. The cost of renewables has meaningfully declined, policy developments will likely only increase after the COVID-19 pandemic. Largely a result of the EU's 2050 net-zero carbon emission policy, European players such as BP and Total are further along the renewable investment path. Given modest U.S. policies and incentives, U.S. integrated firms are much further behind in adopting renewable strategies--and in fact are positioning themselves to be the lowest-cost oil and gas producers rather than renewable energy providers.

A potential catalyst could be new government policies. U.S. President-elect Joe Biden has pledged $2 trillion in "carrot" policies to eliminate greenhouse gases from the electricity grid before 2035. Additional "stick" policies could include banning new permits on federal land as well as methane regulations. Therefore, much needed consolidation and cost reduction within the fragmented E&P wave has finally arrived as players feel the need to merge with peers or be acquired to survive the currents.

2020 Consolidation Results In Neutral To Positive Rating Actions

This year's deals are being done primarily with stock, at minimal premiums. Moreover, most are focused on high quality assets--with several in the prolific Permian Basin--as well as on those companies with clean balance sheets. It's clear risk appetite is at all-time lows as the industry looks to deleverage, leading to a modestly positive credit environment.

Larger, more diversified asset bases give management teams the option to select from better basins and high-grade wells, and they have stronger access to capital markets. As acquisitions are announced in the oil-rich Permian, they add high-quality inventory from the most prolific basin in the U.S., while those acquired gain access stronger financial companies with deeper access to resources suitable for the high decline and reinvestment rates of shale oil. Though not the driving factor, these deals produce underlying synergies and streamline management-related costs. It's difficult to rationalize the number of management teams in an industry that's far from expanding and may reach peak oil over the next decade. Therefore, lower break-evens help improve an ever-lower cost structure.

We do not believe this merger and acquisition (M&A) wave has reached its end, and wonder if the next crest includes distressed names post reorganization as midsize peers look to reduce leverage.

Key Mergers And Acquisitions

ConocoPhillips' acquisition of Concho Resources

ConocoPhillips announced an all-stock acquisition of Permian-focused peer Concho Resources Inc. for $9.7 billion, plus the assumption of $3.9 billion of debt. In our view, this will significantly improve credit measures given Concho's low leverage and ongoing capital discipline. Moreover, the acquisition will add nearly 25% to ConocoPhillips' total proved reserve base and production while boosting its presence in the Permian Basin, enhancing its business risk. Through a combination of direct costs, corporate costs, and reduced exploration costs, ConocoPhillips expects to achieve $500 million in annual cost and capital synergies by 2022. As a result, we affirmed our 'A' issuer credit rating on ConocoPhillips and revised the outlook to stable. We placed the rating on Concho Resources on CreditWatch with positive implications, reflecting the likelihood we will raise it to match our rating on ConocoPhillips following the acquisition.

Pioneer Natural Resources' acquisition of Parsley Energy

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.'s all-stock acquisition of Parsley Energy LLC will make the combined company the largest E&P independent player in the Permian Basin, with a massive acreage position of 930,000 net acres and pro forma oil and gas reserves of 1.7 billion barrels of oil equivalent as of year-end 2019. The companies expect to realize $325 million from operational synergies and lower general and administrative interest expenses. Moreover, given both companies' low leverage compared to peers and the all-stock deal, the ratings on Pioneer were unaffected, while we placed the ratings on Parsley on CreditWatch with positive implications. This reflects the likelihood we will raise our rating on Parsley to match our rating on Pioneer following the acquisition, which we expect will close in the first quarter of 2021.

Chevron's acquisition of Noble Energy

Chevron closed on its all-stock acquisition of Noble Energy Inc., expanding its strong position in the Delaware Basin of the Permian Basin while providing new assets in Israel and the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado. In addition, the company expects to achieve annual run-rate operating and other cost synergies of $300 million before taxes by the end of the first year. We affirmed the ratings and outlook on Chevron, and raised the rating on Noble to that on Chevron at the close, given the all-equity deal. Chevron's assumption of Noble's debt will weaken its financial measures relative to our prior expectations, therefore the outlook remains negative.

Devon Energy's acquisition of WPX Energy

Devon Energy Corp.'s all-stock acquisition of WPX Energy Inc. will increase Devon's proved reserve base and production nearly 70%, bolster its acreage position in the Delaware Basin, and provide a new operating area in the Williston Basin. The acquisition would position Devon well relative to peers rated in the 'BBB-' category before incorporating potential asset sales, and reduce Devon's exposure to federal lands, where regulations could be increased on new drilling after the U.S. presidential election. Moreover, the acquisition will likely improve Devon's credit metrics and cash flows. It likely closes in early 2021. We affirmed the ratings on Devon and revised the outlook to stable from negative, and we put the ratings on WPX on CreditWatch positive.

Cenovus Energy's merger with Husky Energy

Cenovus Energy Inc. and Husky Energy Inc. announced their intention to combine in an all-stock deal, benefiting from an upstream and downstream vertical integration as upstream cash costs remain competitive. While the merged entity benefits from combined refining operations, it's somewhat tempered by the pro forma net long heavy oil exposure, as the consolidated refinery portfolio's processing capability is estimated at about 45% of total blended heavy oil production. We affirmed the ratings on Cenovus, and the outlook remains negative.

Southwestern Energy's acquisition of Montage Resources

This is expected to improve Southwestern Energy Co.'s production and reserve base while providing an expected $30 million of cost-saving synergies, improving efficiencies, reducing leverage, and increasing free cash flow in 2021 and beyond. Moreover, the transaction will increase Southwestern's acreage in both the Utica dry gas and Marcellus rich gas plays, enabling the company to become the third-largest producer in Appalachia. The ratings on Southwestern are unchanged, and we placed the ratings on Montage Resources Corp. on CreditWatch with positive implications.

Table 1

Key Mergers And Acquisitions Among Exploration And Production Companies
Acquirer Acquiree Basin Date Acquirer rating (pre-M&A) Acquiree rating (pre-M&A) Acquiree rating post-close Transaction Premium

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

Parsley Energy LLC

Permian (Midland, Delaware) 10/20/2020 BBB/Stable BB/Stable NA Equity 7.9%


Concho Resources Inc.

Permian (Midland, Delaware) 10/19/2020 A/Negative/A-1 BBB-/Stable NA Equity 15.0%

Devon Energy Corp.

WPX Energy Inc.

Permian (Delaware), Williston 9/28/2020 BBB-/Negative/A-3 BB-/Stable NA Equity 3.0%

Southwestern Energy Co.

Montage Resources Corp.

Appalachia 8/12/2020 BB-/Negative B-/Stable NA Equity 0.0%

Chevron Corp.

Noble Energy Inc.

Denver Julesburg, Permian, Israel, West Africa 7/20/2020 AA/Negative/A-1+ BBB-/Negative/A-3 AA/Negative Equity 12.0%
NA--Not applicable. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Sarah F Sherman, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3550;
Secondary Contacts:Carin Dehne-Kiley, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-1092;
Thomas A Watters, New York (1) 212-438-7818;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back