- The credit fundamentals of Chinese issuers are polarizing in the wake of the pandemic.
- Even as entire sectors continue to encounter slack demand, government stimulus and issuers' adaptive measures have lifted the financial performances of many rated entities.
- The balance of negative and positive rating actions is close to zero, an improvement from the highly negative bias before the outbreak.
Many investors see COVID-19 as a shock to corporate China that has strained credit metrics and squeezed liquidity. The reality is more nuanced. Our rating actions on Chinese firms are actually netting out at about even. Beneath that neutral surface, credit quality is polarizing, with clear winners and losers. S&P Global Ratings expects Chinese issuers' credit standing to continue to diverge into 2021, as entities navigate external shocks with varying skill.
At one extreme, recurring waves of COVID outbreak globally have fueled fears of severe demand contractions and broad corporate distress.
At the other extreme, massive stimulus in China and the country's quicker recovery have led to expectations that rising liquidity will lift entities, and that COVID's effect will be limited.
Such views have swung market sentiment from highs to lows, with investors sometimes overlooking the specific capacity of a firm to adapt to COVID. Some entities have gained from rounds of stimulus, while others have lost market share or have simply adjusted poorly to fast-moving conditions.
Investment-grade names that have adapted well to the pandemic include China Tourism Group Corp. Ltd. We revised our outlook on the group to stable from negative in September 2020 on the view it was recovering faster than we previously expected. This reflected the firm's quick shift in focus to online sales, and swift cost cutting on rent and airport concessions.
We changed the outlook on our rating on JD.com Inc. in the same month to positive from stable because it increased product diversity, raised its online penetration, and improved its market positioning. This came as more consumers shopped online under COVID (see table in the Appendix).
Some speculative-grade entities have also stood out, showing more sales and earnings resilience, and an ability to curtail spending during a crisis.
We revised the outlooks on Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd., Shimao Group Holdings Ltd., and Seazen Group Ltd. to positive, in September.
We revised the outlook on Jingrui Holdings Ltd. to stable from negative in September, and upgraded Jiangsu Zhongnan Construction Group Co. Ltd. to 'B+' from 'B' in October. In both cases, the actions reflected creditworthiness that had improved above the entities' pre-COVID levels.
These rating changes came not just from the stronger speculative-grade firms, but also the smaller entities rated 'B-' to 'B+'. Size is not everything, and prudence is present across the credit spectrum in China.
At the other end of the polarization dynamic, we see issuers belonging to sectors that are still grappling with the effects of the pandemic.
For example, we downgraded Jinjiang International Holding Co. Ltd. to 'BBB-' in October, and 361 Degrees International Ltd. to 'B-', in September. The former belongs to the travel sector, and the latter to bricks-and-mortar retailing. COVID has hit both sectors hard. Entities will likely encounter protracted slumps in their markets, even with the help of ample stimulus.
Those that entered the pandemic with high leverage, and have yet to significantly curtail their growth ambitions, have also seen ratings come under pressure.
These include China Evergrande Group, Yanlord Land (HK) Co. Ltd. and E-House (China) Enterprise Holdings Ltd., on which we revised the outlooks to negative in September.
Lastly, we remain mindful of the effects of other exogenous shocks, such as U.S. trade sanctions. The challenging operating environment under COVID compounded these effects, leading to negative rating actions. We put Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. on CreditWatch with negative implications in October with such circumstances in mind.
The pandemic is not always the most important risk driver. Company-specific risks unrelated to COVID can also trigger positive or negative rating actions. The former includes our removal of Sunshine 100 China Holdings Ltd. from CreditWatch with negative implications after the company secured a loan and sold a project.
The latter includes Weibo Corp.'s placement on CreditWatch with negative implications following the privatization of its parent, SINA Corp. We can also point to the downgrade of ENN Energy Holdings Ltd. to 'BBB' on a restructuring that will make ENN Ecological Holdings Co. Ltd. its controlling shareholder.
Defaults And Its Effects
At the distressed end of the spectrum, for which government stimulus has provided little to no help, defaults are rising.
Recent developments in landmark cases such as Tewoo Group Co. Ltd. and Peking University Founder Group showed that risks can emanate from bond structures (see "Landmark China Default Tests Two Popular Bond Structures," published Sept. 17, 2020, on RatingsDirect).
High-profile failures of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), such as Brilliance Auto Group, Qinghai Provincial Investment Group, and Tianjin Real Estate Group, showed the government may not always bail out its SOEs or improve post-default recovery, even with a massive stimulus underway.
These cases led to more polarization of bond pricing among Chinese corporates, including the SOEs (see "Rising Funding Costs May Tip China's Weaker SOEs Into Default," Sept. 15, 2020).
Polarization At The Macro Level
China's COVID response has also driven divergence at the industry level.
Government stimulus has helped some Chinese industries. For example, we project China will be the world's only auto market to recover to 2019 volumes by 2022 (see "Global Auto Sales Forecasts: Hopes Pinned On China," Sept. 17, 2020).
In the capital goods sector, we note that sales of key machinery and trucks have been growing at 50%-plus year on year since March 2020, raising the prospect of a moderate correction next year (see "China's Cyclical Capital Goods Makers Brace For Downcycle," Oct. 12, 2020).
The government's accelerated infrastructure spending is lifting rated names in the engineering and construction sector. We expect such entities to deliver 8%-10% revenue growth this year (see "China's Infrastructure Push Plucks E&C Firms From COVID Lows," Sept. 30, 2020).
The effects of the pandemic--and related policies and stimulus--should linger for a long time. We note that conditions are not uniformly good or bad, but they are polarizing, and will likely be a key ratings factor well into 2021.
|Recent Rating Actions On Chinese Firms|
China Tourism Group Corp. Ltd.
|Sept. 15, 2020||A-/Stable/--||A-/Negative/--||A-/Stable/--|
|Sept. 3, 2020||BBB/Positive/--||BBB/Stable/--||BBB/Stable/--|
Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd.
|Sept. 2, 2020||BB+/Positive/--||BB+/Stable/--||BB+/Stable/--|
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 4, 2020||BB+/Positive/--||BB+/Stable/--||BB+/Stable/--|
Seazen Group Ltd.
|Nov. 2, 2020||BB/Positive/--||BB/Stable/--||BB/Stable/--|
Seazen Holdings Co. Ltd.
|Nov. 2, 2020||BB/Positive/--||BB/Stable/--||BB/Stable/--|
Jiangsu Zhongnan Construction Group Co. Ltd.
|Oct. 8, 2020||B+/Stable/--||B/Stable/--||B/Positive/--|
Jingrui Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 28, 2020||B/Stable/--||B/Negative/--||B/Negative/--|
Sunshine 100 China Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 22, 2020||CCC-/Negative/--||CCC-/Watch Neg/--||CCC+/Negative/--|
|Oct. 13, 2020||BBB/Watch Neg/--||BBB/Stable/--||BBB/Stable/--|
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 8, 2020||BBB/Stable/--||BBB+/Watch Neg/--||BBB+/Watch Neg/--|
Jinjiang International Holding Co. Ltd.
|Oct. 12, 2020||BBB-/Stable/--||BBB/Negative/--||BBB/Stable/--|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp.
|Oct. 7, 2020||BBB-/Watch Neg/--||BBB-/Positive/--||BBB-/Stable/--|
Yanlord Land Group Ltd.
|Sept. 30, 2020||BB-/Negative/--||BB-/Stable/--||BB/Watch Neg/--|
E-House (China) Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 21, 2020||BB-/Negative/--||BB-/Stable/--||BB/Stable/--|
China Evergrande Group
|Sept. 24, 2020||B+/Negative/--||B+/Stable/--||B+/Stable/--|
361 Degrees International Ltd.
|Sept. 1, 2020||B-/Negative/--||B+/Negative/--||BB-/Negative/--|
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|Sept. 14, 2020||CCC-/Watch Neg/--||CCC/Negative/--||B-/Negative/--|
China Southern Power Grid Co. Ltd.
|Sept. 18, 2020||A+/Negative/--||A+/Negative/--||A+/Negative/--|
COFCO (Hong Kong) Ltd.
|Sept. 18, 2020||A-/Stable/--||A-/Stable/--||A-/Stable/--|
21Vianet Group Inc.
|Sept. 3, 2020||B/Stable/--||B/Stable/--||B+/Stable/--|
China Dili Group
|Sept. 14, 2020||B-/Stable/--||B-/Stable/--||B-/Stable/--|
|*As of Jan.1, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings.|
- China's Cyclical Capital Goods Makers Brace For Downcycle, Oct. 12, 2020
- China's Infrastructure Push Plucks E&C Firms From COVID Lows, Sept. 30, 2020
- Asia-Pacific's Recovery: The Hard Work Begins, Sept. 24, 2020
- China's Energy Transition Stalls Post-COVID, Sept. 22, 2020
- Landmark China Default Tests Two Popular Bond Structures, Sept. 18, 2020
- Global Auto Sales Forecasts: Hopes Pinned On China, Sept. 17, 2020
- Rising Funding Costs May Tip China's Weaker SOEs Into Default, Sept. 15, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|China Country Lead:||Charles Chang, China Country Lead, Hong Kong + 852-2912-3028;|
|China Country Specialist:||Chang Li, China Country Specialist, Beijing + 86 10 6569 2705;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Alex Yang, Hong Kong + 852 25333057;|
|Boyang Gao, Beijing (86) 10-6569-2725;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.