articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/201116-as-the-pandemic-persists-u-s-nonbank-lenders-will-likely-find-their-commercial-real-estate-assets-challengin-11727343 content esgSubNav
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

In This List

As The Pandemic Persists, U.S. Nonbank Lenders Will Likely Find Their Commercial Real Estate Assets Challenging


Japan Banking Outlook 2021: Expect Rising Credit Risks


Fintech Can Revive Japan's Regional Banks


Global Sukuk Issuance Is Set To Increase In 2021


Rating Component Scores For U.S., Canadian, And Bermudian Banks (December 2020)

As The Pandemic Persists, U.S. Nonbank Lenders Will Likely Find Their Commercial Real Estate Assets Challenging

The COVID-19 pandemic's massive impact on travel, shopping, office space usage, and other elements of the economy has made commercial real estate (CRE) one of the asset classes most likely to feel the effects--both in the short and long term. The cash flows and values of many CRE properties--most notably those focusing on hotels, entertainment venues, and certain retail properties--have already declined substantially or will decline. This could lead to struggles meeting their mortgage obligations. As a result, we expect the eight U.S. nonbank CRE lenders we rate to face elevated asset-quality challenges. (For more on bank CRE portfolios, see "U.S. Banks Face Long-Term Risks To Their Commercial Real Estate Asset Quality," also published today.) Hotel and retail portfolios should be affected most, but office and multifamily portfolios will feel the impact as well.

These lenders also often focus on transitional properties and to--a lesser extent--construction loans, both of which typically hold more risk than CRE loans on stabilized properties. Transitional properties generally are not fully leased and are undergoing improvements or being repositioned. Transitional loans typically are three years in duration and often have two one-year extension options. These loans are underwritten with the expectation that the borrower will execute its business plan and the loan will eventually be refinanced at terms based on fully stabilized cash flows.

The Mix Of Loans Varies Property Types

The mix of loans by property type varies among the nonbank lenders that we rate (see Chart 1). We believe loans collateralized by hotel and retail properties are at the most immediate risk, but we also see longer-term uncertainty for office properties.

Chart 1


Since the pandemic-related lockdown in March, hotel vacancies have increased, and revenue per available room has plummeted, which has put significant pressure on hotel properties. Although the pandemic hasn't spared hotels that customers can reach by car, we believe they've fared better than hotels customers must fly to given that COVID-19 has also hit air travel hard. Hotel exposure among the CRE lenders we rate ranged from 4% to 24% as of June 30, 2020, with Apollo Commercial Real Estate, iStar and Starwood Property Trust having the greatest exposures in their CRE loan portfolios.

Although the pandemic has resulted in many retail bankruptcies, retail properties account for less than 10% of loans for most of the nonbank lenders that we rate. Many of these lenders were already cautious about retail, given the challenging outlook for retail long before the pandemic. Also, many of these lenders have focused on necessity retail--such as drug stores--which has suffered less than more discretionary retail.

The demand for office space is uncertain, in our view, reflecting the potential for more work to be conducted offsite even after the pandemic. We believe this is particularly the case in cities such as New York and San Francisco, where there are high costs, long commutes that rely on mass transit, and crowded office towers.

Regardless of the pandemic, everyone still needs a place to live, so we believe that risks to multi-family properties are less than hotels, retail, and office. Nevertheless multi-family properties are not immune, and we expect that heightened unemployment will have at least some impact on rent collections, while there could be decreased demand for condos in urban centers.

CRE Lenders Have Increased Their Allowances For Loan Losses

Many of the CRE lenders that we rate were formed in the aftermath of the 2008-2009 global financial crisis and have only operated in a benign credit environment prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, many of these lenders have had little, if any, credit losses, and their loan loss reserves have tended to be minimal. For those that adopted the CECL (current expected credit loss) method this year, which requires life-of-loan reserves, loan loss reserves generally are at least 1.0% of loans but in some cases over 3.0% (see Chart 2). Privately held lenders are not required to adopt CECL yet, so they generally only establish specific reserves for impaired loans. Through the first half of 2020, net-charge-offs generally have been negligible, but we believe that will be difficult to sustain the longer the pandemic disrupts normal economic activity. We believe most of these lenders have adequate equity cushions to absorb losses, with debt to adjusted total equity under 4x in most cases and under 2x in some cases.

Chart 2


Repurchase Facilities Pose Margin Call Risk For Many

Many of the finance companies we rate rely heavily on repurchase facilities for funding--in some cases for more than half of their borrowings (see Chart 3). The risk of margin calls related to repurchase facilities is elevated, in our view. However, terms and conditions vary across facilities, and some are at greater risk than others. While some facilities allow for collateral to be marked based on market interest rates and credit spreads, many others only allow it to be marked based on credit valuation adjustment events. Also, advance rates under some facilities are subject to look-through advance rates, while others are not. Portolios of CRE securities--particularly CRE CLO tranches--financed with repurchase facilities subject to market based marks came under the most pressure for margin calls during the spring, when market volatility spiked. Although financing conditions have improved from earlier this year, and many of these companies have added liquidity and negotiated some margin call relief, we still view the sector's funding and liquidity risks to be elevated.

Chart 3


Negative Outlooks For CRE Lenders

Earlier this year, we downgraded six of the eight CRE lenders we rate, with the downgrades mainly reflecting weaker assessments of funding profiles amid difficult financing conditions. Although many of these companies have bolstered liquidity and negotiated some margin call relief, we currently have negative outlooks on all eight CRE lenders that we rate (see table). The negative outlooks mainly reflect the potential for asset quality to weaken, resulting in delinquencies and credit losses, as well as the potential for more margin calls over the next 12 months.

CRE Finance Companies' Rating Factor Assessments As of Nov. 2, 2020
Company Anchor Business position Capital, leverage, and earnings Risk position Funding/liquidity Comparable ratings adjustment Issuer Credit Rating Outlook
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc bb+ Moderate Strong Moderate Moderate/Adequate -1 B+ Negative
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. bb+ Moderate Adequate Moderate Moderate/Adequate 0 B+ Negative
Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc bb+ Moderate Strong Moderate Moderate/Adequate -1 B+ Negative
iStar Inc. bb+ Moderate Adequate Moderate Adequate/Adequate 1 BB Negative
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. bb+ Moderate Adequate Moderate Moderate/Adequate 1 BB- Negative
Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP bb+ Moderate Adequate Adequate Moderate/Adequate 0 BB- Negative
LoanCore Capital Markets LLC bb+ Weak Moderate Moderate Moderate/Adequate 1 B Negative
Starwood Property Trust Inc. bb+ Moderate Strong Moderate Moderate/Adequate 0 BB- Negative

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Matthew T Carroll, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3112;
Secondary Contacts:Brendan Browne, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7399;
Adam Grossbard, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 8283;
Diogenes Mejia, New York + 1 (212) 438 0145;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back