articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/201026-mexican-banks-brace-for-widening-credit-losses-11691924 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

In This List

Mexican Banks Brace For Widening Credit Losses


Despite Declining Loss Provisions, U.S. Banks Still Face Asset Quality Risks And Low Interest Rates


Hit To Mexican Nonbank Financial Institutions' Asset Quality Will Depend On Loan Portfolio Exposure By Sector


Earnings Among Large U.S. Banks Rebounded In Third Quarter, But Uncertainty Remains High


As The Pandemic Persists, U.S. Nonbank Lenders Will Likely Find Their Commercial Real Estate Assets Challenging

Mexican Banks Brace For Widening Credit Losses

Weak Economy And COVID-19 Intensify Strains On Mexican Financial Institutions

The Mexican banking system has been one of the hardest hit in the world during 2020, in terms of negative rating actions. This is because of COVID-19 and the collapse in oil prices, along with an economy that slowed in 2019. These factors have increased economic risk for the financial sector, prompting us to revise our BICRA on Mexico to a weaker category and downgrade domestic financial institutions, as well.

Mexico had structural economic weaknesses before the pandemic--due to the limited investment dynamics--that resulted in a mild economic contraction in 2019 and amplified the impact of the pandemic. To the extent that the coronavirus has continued to spread in the country and that the damage to the economy has deepened, we have been adjusting our economic forecast for 2020. We currently expect a 10.4% contraction this year and a weak recovery in 2021, at about 3.7%, one of the weakest among emerging markets. This reflects Mexico's relatively meager policy response to COVID-19, with fiscal stimulus so far totaling about 1% of GDP, mostly consisting of direct transfers to households, and with limited support to small- and medium-size enterprises.

Chart 1


Chart 2


Asset Quality Will Deteriorate, But The Extent Of Damage Is Uncertain

As in other countries, the central bank and the banking regulator in Mexico have taken measures to cushion the impact pandemic-induce economic crisis. The central bank, in addition to having reduced its policy rate by 300 basis points since the beginning of this year (currently at 4.25%), has focused on providing liquidity to the financial system. Moreover, the banking regulator approved a debt moratorium program that allowed borrowers facing financial hardship from the coronavirus pandemic to defer loan payments (for up to four months with the possibility of extending it for an additional two months), as long as they weren't past due as of the end of February 2020. Moreover, the CNBV loosened the provisioning requirements for such loans, provided temporary exceptions on liquidity requirements, and allowed banks to use their regulatory capital buffers to keep expanding their loan portfolios without damaging their minimum regulatory capitalization.

The debt moratorium program, mainly for the consumer loans (including mortgages) and loans to small and midsize enterprises (SMEs), ended on July 31, 2020. We estimate that loans qualifying for this program represented about 20% of total loans as of the same date. This ratio is similar to those in Brazil and Chile, but significantly lower than in Panama and Colombia (see chart below).

Chart 3


It's uncertain how many loans under this program could become delinquent. According to our estimates, the Mexican banking system could post net losses in 2020 if about 20% of the deferred loans become past due that would require provisions to jump. However, in our opinion, the likelihood of banks posting a net loss is low given that about 65%-70% of loans under the relief program are consumer loans, mortgages, and loans to SMEs (on average with a four-month deferral) and payments on about 85% of these loans have resumed.

The second phase of the borrower relief program--which the banking regulator recently announced and whose adoption is not mandatory for banks--would be restructuring loans to borrowers whose income capacity has been damaged by the economic crisis. In general, this phase would allow borrowers to reduce their monthly payments by 25%, either through lower interest rates, extending loan terms, or charge-offs. However, we don't expect banks to participate heavily in this program. This is because as the payment deferrals are ending, results have been better than expected, and customers are meeting their financial obligations. In our opinion, banks, in general, have been preparing to face the potential deterioration on asset quality. Banks that entered the economic crisis with healthy balance sheets and that--conservatively--anticipated creating provisions this year in the face of the severe economic shock, won't need to move to the second phase of the borrower relief program. We believe the banking sector has the ability to maneuver in this complicated situation by restructuring some loans--under the new economic conditions of their customers--without needing to use the provisions that the regulator authorized under this new program.

COVID-19 Will Bite Into Asset Quality And Profitability

In our view, lockdowns in Mexico haven't been as stringent and lengthy as in Argentina, Colombia, and Peru. However, the government's very small fiscal stimulus package to diminish the pandemic's impact, along with limited support to the labor market and businesses, will delay recovery in consumption and investment. In this sense, while we forecast that most economies will return to their pre-pandemic (fourth-quarter 2019) GDP levels in 2022, Mexico might do so in 2024, assuming a constant growth rate. Our base-case scenario assumes that the Mexican economy will contract 10.4% in 2020, and grow only 3.7% in 2021 and 2.6% 2022.

As a result, Mexican banks will be navigating under very challenging operating conditions during this period. We expect the banking system's nonperforming asset (NPAs; past-due loans of more than 90 days and foreclosed assets) ratio to rise to about 3.5% in 2020 from the historical level of about 2.0% and to drop to 3.0% in the next two years. This estimate assumes that 5%-10% of deferred loans will sour. We also assume that NPAs would be fully covered by loan-loss reserves and that net charge-offs to total loans would increase to 4% from an average of 2.5% of the past three years.

Recently, S&P Global Ratings analysts published their expectations for the credit metrics' recovery to the pre-pandemic levels among rated corporations ("COVID-19 Heat Map: Updated Sector Views Show Diverging Recoveries", Sept. 29, 2020). In Chart 4, we show Mexican banks' exposure by sector level impact and recovery.


Chart 4


The increasing provisioning requirements to face the deteriorating asset quality will dent profitability. In addition, low business volumes as a result of weakening credit demand and decreasing interest rates, will deepen the fall in bottom-line results. As such, we expect the banking system's net profits to drop about 50% in 2020 and to recover to pre-pandemic levels in 2022. In this sense, the average return on equity (ROE) would be about 8% in 2020 and recover to 13% in the next two years, while return on assets (ROA) would be about 0.8% and pick up towards 1.7%.

The Banking Sector's Strong Credit Fundamentals Cushion The Blow

Prior to the pandemic, Mexican banks expanded their loan portfolios at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) below 7% for the past three years. During this period, credit rose through conservative growth strategies and stringent lending policies, preventing the industry from expanding its reach in the country--measured by credit to the private sector to GDP, which remains one of the lowest in Latin America (30% at the end of 2019). However, the system's asset quality metrics improved. Therefore, Mexican banks generally entered the pandemic with healthy balance sheets and capitalization levels, which were among the highest in the region. According to our estimates, the consolidated risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio for the Mexican banking system was about 10% at the end of 2019. This reflects the strong capitalization levels with which the largest banks in the country (holding about 80% of total assets in the banking system as of June 30, 2020) are comfortable expanding their businesses.

In our opinion, the maintainance of solid capitalization levels for several years has been possible thanks to the sound asset quality and profitability. Aside from capitalization, another important credit factor behind the sector's resilience are the historically robust levels of loan-loss reserves. As of July 31, 2020, NPAs in the banking system represent 2.2% of total loans plus foreclosed assets, and loan-loss reserves cover 1.6x the total amount of NPAs (1.4x on average during the past five years).

In order to measure the potential resilientcy of Mexican banks to the pandemic-induced economic crisis, we built an exercise in which we added the banking system's total NPAs and foreclosed assets, and netted them with the total loan-loss reserves. Then, we included in that amount the total loans under borrower relief program. Finally, we contrasted that credit exposure with the banking system's total capital. We found that banks capital cover around 1.2x the credit exposure under stress. Moreover, we estimate that about 50%-60% of the loans that entered the relief program have already resumed payments, relieving pressure on banks' capital. Therefore, we conclude that the banking sector holds strong credit fundamentals, which will cushion the blow. This exercise considered the Mexican banking system's regulatory capital as of July 31, 2020.

Chart 5


However, smaller banks with above-average NPAs and below-average financial resources to face expected (reserves) and unexpected (capital) credit losses, and that engaged in aggressive lending before the pandemic, will be more vulnerable to the economic shock caused by COVID-19. The seven largest banks in Mexico hold around 80% of the banking industry's total assets and are in good shape to face pandemic-induced crisis. Medium-size and small niche banks comprise a diverse group of entities from a credit stand of view. For instance, niche banks have smaller loan portfolios with higher customer and sector concentrations, while their NPAs and loan-loss reserve coverage average 3.0% and 1.2x, respectively as of June 30, 2020. These ratios are weaker than those of the seven largest banks 2.1% and 1.7x. On the other hand, niche banks are more dependent on wholesale funding. Their total deposits represent less than 50% of their total liabilities, and their deposit bases have larger concentrations than those of the country's largest banks. However, according to the banking regulator's solvency metrics, niche banks hold higher capitalization levels than the seven largest banks.

We will continue to monitor the credit fundamentals of each niche bank.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Alfredo E Calvo, Mexico City (52) 55-5081-4436;
Secondary Contact:Claudia Sanchez, Mexico City (52) 55-5081-4418;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back