- Chemical companies with significant automotive exposure face headwinds, as S&P Global Ratings revised its 2020 global light vehicle sales forecast to a 20% decline year over year, with recovery to 2019 sales not expected until 2023. Companies that make adhesives, resins, and coatings, such as The Dow Chemical Co. and Momentive Performance Materials Inc., were affected in the second quarter as many automakers halted production in April and May.
- Companies that serve the oil additives and oil refining industries, such as NewMarket Corp. and LyondellBasell Industries N.V., face challenges in those segments as fuel demand fell on significantly reduced travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The pandemic has slowed the timeline for electric vehicle market penetration, affecting lithium producers such as Albermarle Corp.
- Rating activity in the U.S. chemicals sector has been extremely negative. Companies with significant exposure to the automotive market are the hardest hit.
- Barring a second wave of COVID-19, which could spur further economic contraction and slower recovery, automotive production should continue to ramp up in the second half and into 2021 to make up for declining inventory and pent-up demand. This should boost demand for chemicals companies that serve auto-related end markets.
The global automotive industry, a key end market for the commodity and specialty chemicals sector, is trying to rev its way back up to top gear. Auto production stalled in the second quarter of 2020 in response to the coronavirus spread and anticipated downward pressure on new vehicle demand across the globe.
Shutdowns affected not only the automotive sector, but also industries for which automakers are key customers--especially in April, May, and June. However, they have since shown some signs of life in the summer months as economies reopened and production resumed. As the auto sector started to rebound, it lifted certain specialty and commodity chemical producers that serve the industry.
In March, S&P Global Ratings forecast a 15%-20% decline in global light vehicle sales given the anticipated magnitude of the economic fallout from COVID-19-related shutdowns. Six months later, the revised forecast is for the higher end of that range, a 20% decline year over year to 73 million in 2020. Sales declined 24.6% in the first half, a decline unseen in the auto industry's more than 100-year history.
|Updated 2020-2022 Global Light Vehicle Sales Forecast|
|Percentage year-over-year change as of Sept. 16, 2020|
|--Previous projections*--||--New projections**--|
|Rest of the World||(15)||6-8||(25)||6-8||10-12|
|*As of March 23, 2020. **As of Sept. 16, 2020. Source: S&P Global Ratings.|
We predict global light vehicle sales will remain below 2019 levels through 2022. Not only does this muted medium-term forecast affect automakers, but also companies for which the auto sector serves as a major end market. This includes those in specialty and commodity chemicals that manufacture various components used in vehicle production, including resins, adhesives, coatings, sealants, oil additives, synthetic rubbers, and plastics.
Some larger players in the specialty and commodity chemicals sectors have faced significant headwinds in their automotive-related segments, especially in the second quarter of 2020, as curtailed production by key customers significantly reduced volumes for companies such as LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and The Dow Chemical Co. This comes on the heels of a challenging 2019, with global light vehicle sales dropping nearly 5% and hitting their lowest level since 2015. LyondellBasell's intermediates and derivatives, refining, and advanced polymer solutions (APS) segments were affected by significant reductions in demand for transportation fuels and polymers utilized in automotive manufacturing. APS segment sales volumes declined in the second quarter and first six months of 2020, stemming from lower market demand for compounding and solutions, including the automotive market. This led to a 39% decrease in revenue in the second quarter and 26% for the first six months.
We believe the company's EBITDA and credit measures will significantly deteriorate in 2020 due to the global recession, and funds from operations to debt will remain below 30% for a prolonged period beyond 2020. Therefore, on April 3 we lowered our issuer credit rating on LyondellBasell one notch to 'BBB' from 'BBB+' with a negative outlook.
Dow's automotive-related segments represent about $2 billion-$2.5 billion of annual sales. Its sales declined 18% in the first six months. Volume declined for products used in consumer durable goods end markets, including automotive, with the most notable impact in the industrial intermediates and infrastructure and performance materials and coatings operating segments. On April 9, we downgraded Dow and its rated subsidiaries to 'BBB-' from 'BBB'. The downgrade incorporated our expectations for earnings setbacks in 2020 and 2021 relative to our previous projections. The stable outlook reflects our expectation that management will take steps to preserve credit quality, and that Dow will retain key long-term business strengths through a temporary but severe downturn in demand and related challenges.
Another commodity chemicals company with significant automotive exposure, TPC Group Inc., creates butadiene and C4s that go into synthetic rubber used in tire manufacturing. Some of its key customers include major tire manufacturers such as Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., The Michelin Group, and Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. Production cuts, and in some cases halted production from March-May, resulted in a 50% decline in butadiene price during that period. Butadiene pricing and volumes are recovering consistent with expectations as tire manufacturers began to ramp production back up in June. LyondellBasell's olefins and polyolefins segment was similarly impaired in the second quarter of 2020 due to lower prices for butadiene and other C4s. We lowered the issuer credit rating on TPC one notch to 'B-' from 'B' with a negative outlook on April 7, largely due to headwinds in its key end markets.
Some chemicals companies face COVID-19 hurdles in their refining and petroleum additives segments, as a dramatic reduction in miles driven in the first half led to a corresponding reduction in fuel demand and production. One such company in the first half was NewMarket Corp., whose petroleum additives net sales decreased 11.7% from the prior year, primarily due to both lower lubricant additives and fuel additives product shipments. Shipments to customers in the second quarter were down 25.1% from the first quarter. The low point was in May, and in June the company reported some improvement in North America and Asia-Pacific, the latter of which recovered to shipment levels on par with June 2019. Our 'BBB+' rating and stable outlook on NewMarket are unchanged through the downturn.
LyondellBasell's intermediates and derivatives segment struggled in the second quarter, as oxyfuels and related product margins decreased due to lower product prices. Volumes declined as well due to lower gasoline and isobutylene demand. Transportation fuel trends are improving as economic reopening continues into September. The uptick in vehicle miles driven and lower gasoline inventories with increased consumption is increasing refining utilization as production ramps up, although we believe the company's refining segment will not reach pre-COVID-19 levels until 2021 at the earliest.
While Albemarle Corp. derives a significant portion of EBITDA from lithium, it also has a segment that produces catalysts used in refining. In the second quarter, Albemarle's net sales were down about 13% and adjusted EBITDA was down about 29% from the second quarter of 2019. Management stated publicly that third-quarter operating performance will be the company's worst, implying the direct impact of COVID-19 is lagging by one quarter compared to most of its peers. This assumes the macroeconomic situation does not deteriorate further. For the full year, Albemarle expects EBITDA in its lithium segment to be down sequentially 10%-20%, mostly due to lower sales volumes. It expects its bromine segment to be flat sequentially, and its catalysts segment to be down 50%-60% year over year. This demand pressure was not unexpected, however. On April 23, we lowered our issuer credit rating on Albemarle one notch to 'BBB-' from 'BBB' with a stable outlook due to concerns around EBITDA and credit measures in light of the macroeconomic downturn.
What Does This All Mean For Electric Vehicles?
The market penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) has increased rapidly over the last several years, and with that comes higher demand for the lithium-ion battery. The compound annual growth rates expected for lithium over the next five years is among the highest of all end markets served by chemical companies. Two major global lithium producers--Albemarle and Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A.--stand to benefit from the increased EV market penetration and previously announced plans to accelerate lithium capacity expansions.
However, we believe the growth rates in 2020 have taken a bit of a pause, in large part due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Albemarle expects 2020 EBITDA in its lithium segment to be down 10%-20%, in large part due to the decline in auto manufacturing. Additionally, the company faces lower market prices and higher inventory in the battery channel. Albemarle forecasts that the demand profile for battery-grade lithium has been pushed out by about one year and that it is a bit steeper than previously forecast. The company believes additional stimulus measures, such as consumer incentives in Europe, will drive the boosted demand, and that the industry will still arrive at about 1 million net tons of total demand by 2025, driven by electric vehicles. We believe the third and fourth quarters of 2020 will be the low point for the lithium industry, and that the market will begin to recover heading into 2021.
|Key Chemical Sector Rating Actions|
|--As of March 1, 2020--||--As of Sept. 24, 2020--|
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Dow Chemical Co.
Momentive Performance Materials Inc.
TPC Group Inc.
|Source: S&P Global Ratings.|
Rebound Has Begun, But It Will Take Time
Based on company commentary, we believe volumes troughed for chemical firms with heavy auto exposure, but there are signs of life. We expect gradual volume growth, albeit from low second-quarter levels, as automakers ramp up production while economies reopen. For example, August was the fourth-straight month of sequential growth in U.S. light vehicle sales from an April trough. Well diversified chemical companies may improve more rapidly, especially those with ties to more stable consumer and pharmaceutical end markets offsetting some slowness in industrials and the auto sector.
In the second quarter, S&P Global Ratings published a heat map laying it out its EBITDA expectations by industry. At that time, on average we expected EBITDA declines of 15%-25% in 2020 from 2019 for North America chemical companies, and that 2021 EBITDA would be 10%-20% below 2019 levels. In contrast, we expected North American automotive companies' 2020 EBITDA to decline 25%-40%, with 2021 EBITDA remaining 20%-30% below 2019 levels. This helps depict our expectation that, while the automotive end market is showing signs of life the past few months, it's rebounding from such weak levels that it will take some time before global volumes recover to pre-2019 figures.
It is too early to tell what kind of full impact the slowdown will have long term on the chemical sector, but as a whole it has managed its variable costs relatively well, somewhat reducing the EBITDA shortfall for 2020. In 2021, chemical companies may face cost and earnings headwinds tied to plant shutdowns in line with automakers' as well as travel and entertainment costs as plants and travel come back online.
- Global Auto Sales Forecasts: Hopes Pinned On China, Sept. 17, 2020
- COVID-19 Heat Map: Post-Crisis Credit Recovery Could Take To 2022 And Beyond For Some Sectors, June 24, 2020
- U.S. Chemical Companies--Strongest To Weakest, June 22, 2020
- COVID-19 Hurts U.S. Chemical Credit Quality, May 20, 2020
- COVID-19 Will Batter Global Auto Sales And Credit Quality, March 23, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Edward J Hudson, New York + 1 (212) 438 2764;|
|Secondary Contact:||Daniel S Krauss, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-2641;|
|Research Assistant:||Andrew J Stafford, New York|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.