articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/200918-european-office-real-estate-companies-after-a-resilient-first-half-upcoming-lease-maturities-should-test-th-11649122 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

Thank you for your interest in S&P Global Market Intelligence! We noticed you've identified yourself as a student. Through existing partnerships with academic institutions around the globe, it's likely you already have access to our resources. Please contact your professors, library, or administrative staff to receive your student login.

At this time we are unable to offer free trials or product demonstrations directly to students. If you discover that our solutions are not available to you, we encourage you to advocate at your university for a best-in-class learning experience that will help you long after you've completed your degree. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

In This List

European Office Real Estate Companies: After A Resilient First Half, Upcoming Lease Maturities Should Test The Market


Industry Report Card: Top 20 EMEA Chemical Companies And COVID-19: The Credit Impact Relies Largely On Subsector Exposures And Responses


COVID-19 Impact: Key Takeaways From Our Articles


Reassessing The Pace Of Recovery For U.S. Media


Economic Research: Pandemic Won’t Derail European Housing Price Rises

European Office Real Estate Companies: After A Resilient First Half, Upcoming Lease Maturities Should Test The Market

After A Sudden Slowdown In The Second Quarter, The Future Is Unclear For Office Rent Pricing

Unsurprisingly, the second quarter of 2020 was extremely weak for leasing activity in most European office property markets. The Paris market, for example, recorded its worse quarterly performance in 20 years, with a 65% decline from the previous quarter, according to Knight Frank ("Paris Ile-de-France Office Market / Q22020 – July 2020"). Small and intermediate surfaces recorded the biggest transaction declines. We understand that technology firms and professional service providers represented the few active space seekers, which preferred central locations and business districts over city outskirts and other decentralized locations. Arguably, there hasn't yet been any clear sign of a move in rental rates because most leasing transactions concluded in the second quarter were initiated before the outbreak. Vacancy rates, on the other hand, have flattened and somewhat increased in most office markets in the second quarter, after years of continued decline.

Looking ahead, we think the wait-and-see position that tenants have adopted in their real estate decisions could benefit some landlords if renters agree to short-term lease extensions. On the other hand, such a stance would likely make it harder for landlords to lease vacant space and newly built surfaces to be delivered this year--especially where pre-letting of new construction is currently low, such as in some decentralized areas. Moreover, space needed by occupiers may also decrease as remote working increases, companies take cost-saving measures, and economies may only slowly rebound. Those factors could weigh not only on occupancy but also on market rents—the extent of which remains unknown in the absence of a significant number of leasing transactions.

Chart 1


Rents And Valuations Have Been Resilient So Far

Rental growth remained mostly positive in the first half, boosted by a strong first quarter

Despite a sharp slowdown in leasing activity in the second quarter, most office property portfolios reported positive rental growth in the half, compared with first-half 2019. This organic growth was fueled by indexation and strong rent increases in the first quarter and was fully or partly offset by rent concessions and occupancy declines during lockdowns. Societe Fonciere Lyonnaise's performance suffered from the closure of conference centers, Hotel Indigo, and the Edouard VII car park, without which rent growth would have been stable for its office portfolio. For our rated companies, we do not expect revenues from office assets to rebound strongly in 2021 because of what are likely to be subdued indexation rates and rent increases on extensions or renegotiations.

Chart 2


Occupancy started declining slightly, except in German portfolios

While rents have remained relatively resilient, we observe a widespread trend of declining occupancy, as shown by a 90 basis points drop on average in financial occupancy--actual rental income divided by potential rental income that could be received if the portfolio was fully leased and occupied. France, Belgium, and Spain, for example, saw declines. In contrast, rated companies in the German office market recorded increases in financial occupancy.

Chart 3


Rent collection remained high at the peak of lockdowns, highlighting limited tenant stress

Reported rent collection in the first half has been high and between 95% and 100% in the second quarter, which is close to normal for the office market. While the figure generally excludes rent deferrals and agreed rent fees, we note it is much higher in the office segment than in the retail property segment. We believe this is due to the higher diversity and stronger creditworthiness of tenants, at least within our rated group of companies.

Chart 4


Valuations declined moderately, mainly because of cash flow readjustment by appraisers

Valuations of office assets declined slightly as of June 20, 2020, from Dec. 31, 2019. For most of the devaluations, the main driver was a cash flow adjustment by appraisers based on lower indexation expectations for next year and some stressed operating assumptions due to COVID-19. However, we understand that none to very little of the value depreciation actually came from yield expansion, the other possible factor of valuation loss, mostly due to the absence of benchmark transactions. For German assets, revaluations were slightly more negative while rents were more resilient. What's more, for most of the diversified players we rate, revaluations of office assets often offset revaluation losses from other assets. Further devaluations are likely in case vacancies rise further, market rents decline more than what appraisers currently anticipate, or assets are sold at a large discount to their last appraisal value.

Chart 5


The Next Expiring Leases Could Test Landlords

Generally speaking, rents coming to expiry or break options represent risks for landlords of reletting space below the previous rent or leaving it vacant, which in both cases mean a revenue loss for them. We estimate that about 19% of companies' rental income is coming to maturity or is being subject to a tenant's option to exit without penalty in the next 18 months from June 30, 2020. If the current market uncertainty prevails, we conservatively assume 10%-15% discounts on newly signed leases for the next 12 months in our forecasts.

That said, average lease terms vary, with Central and Eastern European countries exhibiting lower maturities than Western countries. The type of tenant is also a factor, as government-owned entities are more inclined to lease over longer periods.

Chart 6


Chart 7


Most Companies Have Enough Rating Cushion, Despite Some Thinning

As we expected, our key credit ratios weakened for most of our rated office property companies to June 30, 2020. However, this is within the rating cushion that companies had previously built in their credit metrics, that is, for a 5% decline in rent and revaluation by end-2020, also our base-case scenario.

Chart 8


EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratios have been slipping somewhat because of weak or stagnant revenue. In most cases, rated issuers showed ratios within our minimum expectations for the current ratings, with headroom of 90 basis points on average as of June 30, 2020. The decline in interest coverage ratio for Merlin Properties and CPI Property came from the temporary closure of some of their retail assets and discounts granted to tenants recognized in the second-quarter revenues. We expect their revenues to rebound gradually and move the ratios more strongly above 3x in 2021.

Chart 9


The real estate investment trusts (REITs) we rate in Europe have built large buffers, as illustrated by strengthening debt-to-debt and equity (D/D+E) ratios, owing to a rise in valuations in the past few years. As of June 30, 2020, the pandemic has led to some valuation losses that lifted issuers' D/D+E ratios by 1 percentage point on average. CPI Property Group's D/D+E ratio has increased more sharply mainly because of the devaluation of its retail assets. However, we estimate average headroom of 5.4 percentage points under our current rating thresholds, excluding companies that have not yet reported first-half earnings and DIOK, which has no D/D+E rating threshold.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Franck Delage, Paris (33) 1-4420-6778;
Secondary Contacts:Marie-Aude Vialle, Paris (33) 6-1566-9056;
Nicole Reinhardt, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9303;
Additional Contact:Industrial Ratings Europe;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back