articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/200716-as-the-north-american-retail-and-restaurant-sector-braces-for-another-wave-of-downward-rating-actions-a-few-11526007 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

As The North American Retail And Restaurant Sector Braces For Another Wave Of Downward Rating Actions, A Few Subsectors See Signs Of Hope

COMMENTS

COVID-19 Impact: Key Takeaways From Our Articles

COMMENTS

CLO Spotlight: U.S. CLO Defaults As Of Dec. 28, 2021

COMMENTS

Global Chemical Companies--Strongest To Weakest

COMMENTS

Global FMI Sector Outlook 2022: Growth Initiatives Will Be Key To Increasing Earnings


As The North American Retail And Restaurant Sector Braces For Another Wave Of Downward Rating Actions, A Few Subsectors See Signs Of Hope

The retail and restaurant sectors have been under stress for years. The default rate of speculative-grade issuers in these sectors has been 10% since 2017, when the U.S. and Canadian economy was still in its expansionary period. This compares to a more typical default rate of 2%-3% in the corporate sector during such benign times. Secular pressures from the growth of e-commerce, increasing competition for share of wallet, and the generational shift of spending on experiences have weighed on the retail sector. In restaurants, competition from grocers' prepared food offerings, changing millennial dining preferences, and delivery cost pressures have challenged the traditional casual dining and quick service restaurant (QSR) models. These pressures and private equity piling on debt have driven many restaurant ratings down over the past several years.

S&P Global Ratings acknowledges a high degree of uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic. The consensus among health experts is that the pandemic may now be at, or near, its peak in some regions but will remain a threat until a vaccine or effective treatment is widely available, which may not occur until the second half of 2021. We are using this assumption in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.

When the COVID-19 pandemic struck and the shutdown to contain it hit the U.S. in March, the risks in the retail and restaurant sectors spiked dramatically, as evident in S&P Global Ratings' rating actions. From early March through mid-June, we took nearly 100 negative rating actions directly related to the impact of the pandemic across a universe of about 130 rated entities, about two-thirds of which were downgrades (see chart 3). The negative bias in our portfolio has nearly doubled (see chart 4). The vast majority of our rating actions were on speculative-grade companies (rated 'BB+' or lower) which tend to be less stable than investment-grade companies ('BBB-' or higher ratings), but the increase in potential fallen angels (companies rated 'BBB-' with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications) to five from zero speaks to the profound impact the pandemic has had across the credit spectrum. Macy's Inc. (B+/Negative/--) entered the pandemic as a fallen angel after we downgraded it to 'BB+' in February due to strategy execution risk amid secular headwinds. We subsequently lowered Macy's three more notches to 'B+' as the scope of the pandemic's impact unfolded. We also lowered more than 20 companies into the 'CCC' category. One fourth of the companies in the sector are now in the 'CCC' category, implying the default rate will be substantially higher than in recent years. In fact, the 16 defaults year-to-date has already surpassed all of 2019. If there are no more this year, the spec-grade default rate would be about 18%.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Early in the pandemic, market volatility put companies facing liquidity concerns and tightening covenant headroom at risk. Proactive revolver draws across the sector provided quick access to cash, but increased the risk of covenant breaches. As credit markets stabilized following intervention by the U.S. Federal Reserve, investment-grade and speculative-grade issuers capitalized on the opportunity to refinance near-term maturities, bolster cash on hand, and seek covenant relief. This relief has taken different forms, including temporarily suspending and/or waiving financial maintenance covenants tests, redefining covenant calculations to include the prior year's earnings, and adding new covenants in place of existing ones, such as minimum liquidity requirements.

Table 1

Covenant Relief Activity
Date Company Rating Sector Covenant amended
6/17 Noodles & Co. N.R. Restaurants Leverage, fixed charge
6/15 BJ's Restaurants N.R. Restaurants Fixed charge
6/10

Starbucks Corp.

BBB+/Negative/-- Restaurants Fixed charge
6/9

Parkland Corp.

BB/Stable/-- Retail Leverage
6/9 Vince N.R. Retail Fixed charge
6/8

Tiffany & Co.

BBB+/Watch Pos/-- Retail Leverage, fixed charge
6/5

Conn's Inc.

B-/Negative/-- Retail Interest coverage
6/5 Movado Group N.R. Retail Leverage
5/29 Red Robin Gourmet Burgers N.R. Restaurants Leverage, fixed charge
5/28 Cracker Barrel N.R. Restaurants Leverage, interest coverage
5/13 Denny's N.R. Restaurants Leverage, fixed charge
5/11 Texas Roadhouse N.R. Restaurants Leverage, fixed charge
5/6

Brinker International Inc.

B+/Negative/-- Restaurants Leverage, fixed charge
5/4

Bloomin' Brands Inc.

B+/Negative/-- Restaurants Leverage
5/1

TJX Cos. Inc.

A/Negative/A-1 Retail Leverage
4/30

Dillard's Inc.

BB-/Negative/-- Retail Leverage
4/16

Nordstrom Inc.

BBB-/Negative/A-3 Retail Leverage
4/15 Dave & Buster's N.R. Restaurants Leverage, interest coverage
4/8 e.l.f. Beauty N.R. Retail Leverage, fixed charge
4/3

Restaurant Brands International Inc.

BB/Negative/-- Restaurants Leverage
N.R.--Not rated. Source: LCD, an offering of S&P Global Market Intelligence; S&P Global Ratings

The Default Rate Will Hinge On The Shape Of The Recovery

In our view, 2020's default rate will depend largely on the trajectory of the recovery. If recent improvements gain momentum--that is, if consumers continue to spend even after government support expires, and the virus is largely contained, we would expect the spec-grade default rate to creep up only slightly from where it stands today (about 18%) and believe most of the defaults would have occurred by this point. However, if a resurgence of the virus and another round of shutdowns further damages consumer confidence, and in turn financial markets falter, we could see the default rate approach 30%. This includes exchanges that we view as tantamount to default. We would expect the bulk of these to be concentrated in the hardest-hit areas of the sector: apparel and casual dining.

We recently updated our economic forecast to reflect what we believe will be an extended and nonlinear road to recovery (See "Economic Research: The U.S. Faces A Longer And Slower Climb From The Bottom," June 25, 2020, and "Economic Research: Canada's Economy Faces A Patchy Recovery," June 29, 2020).

Some bright spots exist

Despite the grim economic outlook, pockets of retail and restaurants have fared relatively well. The biggest winners have been grocers and other retailers that offer staples, who have benefitted from the stay-at-home mandates as consumers stock pantries and general merchandise, including cleaning products. We've also noted that some specialty retailers of products widely considered discretionary have fared better than we expected while others continue to struggle. A driving factor of which camp a retailer falls into is whether the products are intended to be used at home. For instance, some retailers who serve the home improvement, home decor and furnishings, gardening, fitness and outdoors, and the home office and electronics markets have shown positive trends or green shoots, despite in many cases having had to close their physical stores and pivot to imperfect e-commerce operations that had to be scaled up overnight. However, we are cautious about early positive trends coming out of the shutdown because we believe some consumer spending has been supported by government programs in the U.S., including generous unemployment benefits which will roll off by the end of July.

Table 2

Recent Home-Centric Retail Performance Trends
Retailer Rating Recent performance trends

Home Depot Inc.

A/Stable/A-1 Comparable sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2020 (ended May 3, 2020) were positive 6.4%, and comparable sales in the U.S. were positive 7.5%.

Lowe's Cos. Inc.

BBB+/Stable/A-2 Comparable sales for the U.S. home improvement business increased 12.3% for the first quarter (ended May 1, 2020).

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd.

BBB/Negative/A-2 April sales at CTR banner down only 1.8% in spite of closure of Ontario stores (40% of network). Ontario stores reopened in May.

Sally Beauty Holdings Inc.

BB-/Negative/-- Strong consumer and professional demand in reopened stores leading to enterprise-wide estimated sales for June up 9% year-over-year.

Michaels Cos. Inc.

B/Negative/-- Stores that reopened in May were met with an average of 11% comparable sales growth as of early June.

At Home Group Inc.

CCC+/Negative/-- Initial sales in reopened stores (as of June 18, 2020) are up solid double digits versus the same period last year.
Source: S&P Global Ratings and company data.

Another pocket of better-than-expected performance is the quick service restaurant (QSR) sector. Several QSRs have posted positive comps or are rapidly approaching last year's topline. These companies are well-positioned for social distancing mandates and economic weakness. Off-premise operations including take-away, delivery, and drive-thru, enabled QSRs to capitalize on consumers who wanted to take a break from cooking at home while dining rooms were closed. With capacity limited at dine-in restaurants and consumers' lingering wariness of the virus, off-premise operations are likely to continue to take share and benefit from healthy demand. Casual diners have made headway in shifting operations to serve off-premise demand partly via third-party delivery services (see chart 4), but until they can open to full capacity and diners are ready to return, we believe they will continue to be well behind QSRs' performance (see table 3). Historically, QSRs have shown resilience to economic downturns as consumers carefully watch their spending and trade down from full-service dining experiences. This dynamic bodes well for QSRs given the slow economic recovery we expect although offsetting risks include a weak breakfast daypart because of altered commuting habits and high unemployment. We believe credit metrics could be restored for QSRs in the first half of 2021, but casual diners will likely need until late 2022 to bring back credit measures.

Table 3

QSR Versus Casual Dining Recent Performance Trends
Brand Sector March YoY sales growth April YoY sales growth May YoY sales growth
Popeye's QSR 27% 33% 48%
Chick-fil-A QSR -9% -7% 8%
Taco Bell QSR -15% -12% 2%
Wendy's QSR -10% -13% -1%
Chilis Casual -31% -37% -20%
Olive Garden Casual -33% -38% -28%
Buffalo Wild Wings Casual -37% -43% -38%
IHOP Casual -42% -82% -64%
QSR--Quick Service Restaurant. YoY--Year over year. Source: Earnest Research.

Chart 4

image

Uncertain prospects for most of the sector

While we are still focused on the many near-term risks cited earlier, if the recovery gains momentum, we believe we could take positive rating actions including revising outlooks to stable from negative on QSRs and retailers that cater to homebound life in the coming months. For instance, we recently upgraded Carrols Restaurant Group Inc. (B-/Negative/--) to 'B-' from 'CCC+' on improved liquidity and performance. Still, the rating outlook is negative, reflecting our view that prospects for the majority of retailers and restaurants remain uncertain with risks to the downside. In the grocery sector we recently upgraded two companies: BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc. (BB-/Positive/--) and The Fresh Market (CCC+/Negative/--), both due in part to a surge in sales.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Sarah E Wyeth, New York (1) 212-438-5658;
sarah.wyeth@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Aniki Saha-Yannopoulos, CFA, PhD, Toronto (1) 416-507-2579;
aniki.saha-yannopoulos@spglobal.com
Lauren E Slade, New York + 1 (212) 438 1421;
lauren.slade@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back