- We expect the Islamic finance industry to show low-to-mid-single-digit growth in 2020-2021 after 11.4% in 2019 following strong sukuk market performance.
- COVID-19 offers an opportunity for more integrated and transformative growth with a higher degree of standardization, stronger focus on the industry's social role, and meaningful adoption of financial technology (fintech).
- Coordination between different stakeholders is key to the industry leveraging these opportunities for sustainable growth.
S&P Global Ratings believes the global Islamic finance industry will return to slow growth in 2020-2021 after strong performance in 2019 underpinned by a more dynamic sukuk market. The significant slowdown of core Islamic finance economies in 2020, because of measures implemented by various governments to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, and the expected mild recovery in 2021, explain our expectations.
At the same time, we see an opportunity in the current environment for accelerating and unlocking the long term potential of the industry. Stakeholders are realizing the importance of standardization as government coffers are depleted and access to sukuk remains time consuming and more complicated than conventional instruments. Lockdown measures have also shown the importance of leveraging technology and creating a nimbler industry. Furthermore, industry players have been discussing the potential use of social instruments to help companies and individuals economically affected by the pandemic. With the right coordination between different Islamic finance stakeholders, we believe the industry could create new avenues of sustainable growth that serve the markets.
Recession and Mild Recovery Thereafter Will Hold Growth Through 2020-2021
After strong performance in 2019 explained by higher-than-expected sukuk issuance, we believe Islamic finance industry growth will slow in 2020-2021 due to lockdown measures and ensuing recessions in Islamic finance core countries (see charts 1 and 2).
We expect Islamic banking to show at best stable total assets or low-single-digit growth. This follows 6.6% growth in 2019 thanks to good performance in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Malaysia, and to a lesser extent Turkey and Indonesia, but a declining contribution from Iran amid the deep recession reported by the IMF. In 2020, we expect a slowdown spurred primarily by measures implemented by various governments to control the COVID-19 pandemic. This slowdown will be somewhat counterbalanced by strong liquidity injections from various central banks to help their banking systems navigate the difficult environment. However, this, together with complexity and lower investor appetite, will contribute to a sukuk market slowdown in 2020. We project the volume of issuance will reach $100 billion in 2020 compared with $162 billion in 2019--when Turkey, returning GCC issuers, Malaysia, and Indonesia supported the market (see Chart 3).
The market was, in fact, poised for good performance in 2020 but the pandemic and lower oil prices changed the outlook. Amid tougher conditions, we also don't see core Islamic finance countries using sukuk as a primary source of funding despite their higher financing needs. However, we think that Turkey might try to tap the market aggressively in 2020 to use all of its available funding options. More broadly, we continue to see the takaful sector expanding at mid-single-to-high-digit rates, while the funds industry might see some negative effects from market volatility. Overall, we believe low-to-mid-single-digit growth for the overall industry is a fair assumption over the next two years. However, in our view, COVID-19 offers an opportunity for more integrated and multifaceted growth with higher standardization, stronger focus on the industry's social role, and greater use of fintech. This can be achieved through higher coordination between the industry's different stakeholders.
Social Islamic Finance Instruments Can Make A Difference
COVID-19 is causing a significant slowdown in core Islamic finance markets and a spike in unemployment. Although the predominantly migrant population structure in the Gulf and governments' support packages could absorb some of the shock, several stakeholders will lose a portion of their income. We think four Islamic finance social instruments in particular can help core Islamic countries, banks, and corporations navigate the current situation (see Related Research).
- Qard Hassan--This instrument could provide cost-free breathing space until the environment stabilizes. One example is when some GCC central banks opened free liquidity lines for financial institutions to provide subsidized lending to their corporate and small and midsize enterprise clients.
- Social sukuk--These instruments could help support the education and health care systems amid the current slump and attract environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investors (those investing for social reasons) and/or Islamic investors (those looking for Sharia-compliant investments).
- Waqf--This could help provide affordable housing solutions or access to health care and education for people that might have lost a portion of their income.
- Zakat--Based on our conversations with market participants, we believe that Zakat could help compensate for lost household income because of COVID-19.
These instruments, together with green sukuk--which are taking a back seat this year--and the additional layer of governance Islamic banks and instruments are subject to could help put the industry more prominently on ESG investors' radar.
Streamlining Sukuk Issuance Will Restore Its Attractiveness
Sukuk instruments remain more complex and time consuming for issuers compared with conventional bonds (see chart 4). As with previous crises, for example when oil prices crashed in 2014, the pandemic has shown that when core Islamic finance issuers need faster access to capital markets they typically use conventional instruments. In the first five months of 2020, the total volume of sukuk issuance dropped 38% compared with the same period in 2019. Exceptions include issuers that have already established programs or can tap a recent issuance; issuers that are under stress and need to access all available funding sources; or issuers that are domiciled in jurisdictions where the sukuk process is streamlined.
We acknowledge that the market has developed a certain way of doing transactions. However, a global set of standards that would be acceptable to all stakeholders is still lacking. The different standard setters of the industry--the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI), the Islamic Financial Service Board (IFSB), and the International Islamic Financial Market (IIFM)--are working together to drive this agenda. More recently, the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Finance, the Islamic Development Bank, and the Dubai Islamic Economy Development Centre (DIEDC) established a partnership to develop an international legislative framework for Islamic finance, with the goal of accelerating growth and reducing discrepancies around the globe.
We view this as a step in the right direction as differences persist. For example, countries that adopted the AAOIFI standards might deem some sukuk structures commonly used in core Islamic finance countries noncompliant. This emphasizes the necessity for a critical review of some of the existing standards and the adoption of an inclusive approach taking on board the views of all stakeholders. The process would ultimately lead to standardization of the full spectrum of sukuk (from fixed-income-like instruments to equity-like) factoring the requirements of regulators, sukuk issuers, and investors. Standardization includes both aspects of sukuk: sharia interpretation and legal documentation. When sukuk issuance become comparable with conventional instruments from a cost and effort perspective they will find a more prominent place on issuers' and investors' books.
Fintech Will Enhance The Industry's Resilience
Lockdown measures have demonstrated how the capacity of a company or a bank to shift its business online is critical for its continuity. For Islamic banks and sukuk, higher digitalization and fintech collaboration could help strengthen their resilience in a more volatile environment and open new avenues for growth.
However, recent months have demonstrated that there is still room for improvement. For example, because of the lack of financial inclusion and dedicated digital solutions, workers' remittances were delayed in some countries as exchange and money transfer outlets were closed. Sukuk structuring and issuance were also delayed because of a lack of fintech, despite the creation of a new platform where the issuance process is reportedly fairly streamlined. Last year, a new platform for sukuk issuance and management using data technology blockchain was launched. This platform, if adopted by the market, could boost GCC issuance volumes over time, since it significantly simplifies sukuk processes. It relies on a set of standardized legal documentation for sukuk structure. The issuer can just plug in its underlying assets and start building its investor book with a few clicks. The overall transaction is managed using blockchain, which helps improve transparency and traceability. This platform can also open the market to a new class of issuers that were until now excluded because of costs or complexity. More importantly, this shows that standardization of legal documents and Sharia rulings is actually achievable. Additionally, security of transactions and resisting cyberattacks while remaining in compliance with existing regulations has proven to be a prominent source of risk and could be remedied using regulatory technology.
A prerequisite for fintech enriching the Islamic finance industry is the provision of adequate physical infrastructure and implementation of the necessary supervision and regulatory framework. This is why several regulators/authorities in the GCC and elsewhere have launched incubators or specific regulatory sandboxes where fintech companies can test innovations.
How Are Islamic Finance Ratings Affected?
In our view, fintech and social instruments will have a limited bearing on Islamic finance ratings in the next two years. So long as the use of social products or a more lenient approach to cost reduction is not significantly affecting banks' profitability, the impact on their creditworthiness would be limited. Similarly, we would not expect the social nature of a sukuk to affect the instrument's creditworthiness as long as we don't see any changes in the sponsor's financial obligations to pay sufficient amounts for the periodic distribution and principal reimbursement. We also forecast only a marginal influence from fintech on our Islamic bank and sukuk ratings over the next two years. We consider that Islamic banks will be able to adapt to their changing operating environment through a combination of collaboration with fintech companies and cost-reduction measures. We also believe that regulators across the wider Islamic finance landscape will continue to protect the financial stability of their banking systems. Moreover, although we think that blockchain could help the operational management of sukuk, we believe it will not induce any changes in the legal substance of transactions.
- Islamic Finance And ESG: Sharia-Compliant Instruments Can Put The S In ESG, May 27, 2020
- How Resistant Are Gulf Banks To The COVID-19 Pandemic And Oil Price Shock?, April 22, 2020
- Credit FAQ: Will COVID-19 And Cheap Oil Reset The Market For GCC Tier 1 Instruments?, April 22, 2020
- Virus, Oil, And Volatility Will Put Sukuk Issuance Into Reverse, April 13, 2020
- GCC Banks Face An Earnings Shock From The Oil Price Drop And COVID-19 Pandemic, April 6, 2020
- AAOIFI's Proposal May Result In Different Interpretations On The Treatment Of Unrestricted Investment Accounts, Jan. 29, 2020
Only a rating committee may determine a rating action and this report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Mohamed Damak, Dubai (971) 4-372-7153;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Dhruv Roy, Dubai (971) 4-372-7169;|
|Samira Mensah, Johannesburg (27) 11-214-4869;|
|Additional Contact:||Financial Institutions Ratings Europe;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.