- Despite our projection that average eurozone government debt will increase by just under 15 percentage points of GDP this year, we have recently affirmed our ratings on Austria, Spain, Belgium, Germany, France, Greece, Italy, and Portugal.
- This is because, in our view, monetary flexibility and economic resilience play a larger role in a country's ability and willingness to service debt than a single year's fiscal outcome.
- While debt to GDP is on the rise, debt-servicing costs continue to decline, benefiting eurozone creditworthiness.
Since eurozone governments put their economies into lockdown in mid-March, we have sharply lowered our European macroeconomic forecasts, reflecting our expectation that the pandemic will do more damage to economic growth and public finances than the 2008-2010 global financial crisis.
Despite our projection that government debt will increase on average by just under 15 percentage points (ppts) of GDP for the larger euro area member states, since March 13 we have affirmed the ratings on Austria, Spain, Belgium, Germany, France, Greece, Italy, and Portugal. We have done so because we think that the willingness and ability of countries to service their debt on time and in full depends more on their monetary flexibility and economic resilience than it does on their public debt to GDP ratio at any point in time. While government debt to GDP is a relevant component of our sovereign rating methodology, our analysis of sovereign creditworthiness is informed by other, equally important, aspects of a government's debt profile. Indeed, apart from other rating factors (institutional assessment, economic assessment, external assessment, monetary assessment), it is precisely these aspects that can explain differences in our assessments of government debt positions between sovereigns with a similar stock of government debt in GDP terms.
There are seven key questions we ask ourselves when assessing a government's debt profile beyond its debt to GDP ratio.
Is debt denominated in domestic or foreign currency? Perhaps the key difference between sovereigns and companies is that governments can create the currency in which they borrow. Sovereigns that borrow in a currency they cannot create are far more vulnerable to default than those that borrow in their own legal tender, as are economies in which the private sector is highly indebted in a foreign rather than domestic currency. High foreign currency debt--so-called "original sin"--is largely absent in the euro area economies. Wealthy economies typically benefit from deep local currency capital markets fed by sizeable pension systems backed by household savings. In this context, we note the speed of the European Central Bank's (ECB's) monetary policy reaction in response to COVID-19 this year compared to its delayed deployment during the 2008-2012 global economic and financial crisis. During the global financial crisis, several eurozone sovereigns issued in dollars, partly owing to market questions around central bank supportiveness. That is not the story in 2020.
What is the average maturity of a country's debt? Currently, most eurozone member states' average debt maturities exceed seven years, meaning that only one seventh of the debt has to be refinanced every year. The average maturity of public debt in Ireland stands at 10 years. For Greece, it is 20 years including official obligations, which make up 82% of total Greek government debt. Having a long-dated debt profile goes a long way to immunizing a country's budget from the immediate cost of an interest-rate shock. In the case of Italy, a 100 basis points rise in its cost of issuance tomorrow would increase interest expenditure to GDP during the first year by an estimated 0.1 ppts of GDP, and by 0.3 ppts in the second year.
How much of the stock of government debt is held by residents and nonresidents? In the euro area, domestic ownership varies from member state to member state. In Italy's case, as of end-January 2020, 68% of the government debt stock was held by domestic residents, largely by domestic banks and other financial institutions. Italy's national central bank, the Banca d'Italia, holds an estimated 17% of Italy's public debt, as a consequence of its purchases in the secondary market after the ECB introduced the Public Sector Purchase Program (PSPP) as part of the QE it launched in 2015. Governments rarely default to domestic residents, as this invariably decapitalizes a country's banking system and leads to a protracted economic crisis and the government having to recapitalize its financial system. One reason why Greece's debt to GDP ratio barely declined in the aftermath of its 2012 default is because--following the sharp reduction of exposures by nonresidents and the pre-default swap of ESCB holdings--Greece defaulted principally to its own domestic banking system. The price of that default was the price of Greece borrowing from official creditors to recapitalize its badly damaged banks. Debt to GDP briefly came down after the default before rising again as Greece took on official loans to finance the necessary capital injection into its domestic financial system.
Is government debt commercial or non-commercial? We determine whether government debt is commercial or not based on the identity of the creditor. Our credit ratings are assessments of the likelihood of default on commercial debt only. Public creditors such as governments, central banks, and supranationals (such as the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism, its replacement the European Stability Mechanism [ESM], the ECB, and all national central banks in the Eurosystem) are not commercial creditors. The status of a central bank's holdings in this context will be characterized by its policies with respect to government debt purchases. The Eurosystem, for example, regularly reinvests the proceeds from its PSPP into additional government debt purchases. In the case of Greek government bonds, which have not been eligible for the PSPP, the Eurosystem has been transferring the profits made on its holdings (SMP/ANFA) to the Greek government as a part of the official creditor agreement, subject to compliance with the program conditions and post-program monitoring. We expect the ECB's supportive orientation will continue in order to avoid any policy-induced disruption in its monetary policy transmission across the eurozone.
Beyond the considerations of ECB operations, sovereigns such as Greece, Ireland, or Portugal, in which a significant percentage of government debt is official rather than commercial, typically benefit from a long-dated maturity structure and very low nominal borrowing costs. Just under one-fifth of Irish government debt is made up of bilateral non-commercial loans from the U.K. and EU. Add to this an estimated 15% of Irish government bonds held by the ECB, and that leaves over one-third of the country's debt stock in the hands of non-commercial creditors. The split is broadly similar for Portugal, with 21% of Portuguese government debt owed to the EU-IMF, and just under 17% held by the ECB (Banco do Portugal in this case) at the end of 2019. The benefits to the lifespan and cost of a country's debt profile that come from bilateral loans in our view outweigh the de facto preferred creditor status of bilateral lending from the EU to euro area member states such as Greece, Ireland, and Portugal when we assess the likelihood that they would default to commercial creditors.
Are governments subject to a lumpy maturity structure or do they have a large portion of outstanding floating-rate or inflation-linked debt that would render funding costs more volatile and sensitive to policy rates or inflation dynamics? In our view, these are not important considerations for any eurozone member, though some have a component of floating rate bonds (17% of Italy's government debt stock). For many emerging market borrowers there are frequently debt redemption spikes. In general, the higher you go up the rating ladder, the smoother the maturity schedule. This is because higher rated sovereigns typically benefit from liquid domestic capital markets and hence have the capacity to build out a yield curve, particularly at the long end. Last week, Spain issued a 30-year bond at a weighted average rate of 1.67%.
Is government debt issued under foreign law or national law? Are collective action clauses inserted into the terms of the security? All things being equal, it is more challenging to restructure foreign law debt than domestic law debt. Put simply, a national law can be modified to alter the terms of a domestic law security (an alteration that we would probably consider tantamount to a default). For example, sovereigns (other than the U.K. or U.S. themselves) cannot modify U.K. or U.S. law to suit their debt-servicing requirements. In accordance with the ESM treaty, beginning on Jan. 1, 2013, all euro area governments introduced collective action clauses into their debt securities with a maturity exceeding one year. The purpose of these clauses is to make it easier for governments to restructure debt, and to limit the capacity of non-participants (holdouts) in debt restructurings to litigate against countries in default.
Finally, but probably most importantly, what is the fiscal cost of servicing public debt? The current average yield at issuance for every member of the eurozone is far below the average cost of debt. For example, as much higher coupon debt originally issued before 2015 matures, it is being replaced during 2020 at considerably lower rates. Italy's current average yield of issuance is 0.8%, and Spain's is 0.3%, whereas the average cost of debt (across their entire profiles) for Italy and Spain is 2.5% and 2.0%, respectively. Those estimates exclude the dividends that national central banks are paying to eurozone central governments on the back of their interest earnings on these holdings. As a consequence, interest payments to revenues, as well as a percentage of GDP, has come down materially since 2015, and--after a break in 2020--will continue to fall, despite rising debt to GDP.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Frank Gill, Madrid (34) 91-788-7213;|
|Secondary Contact:||Marko Mrsnik, Madrid (34) 91-389-6953;|
|Additional Contact:||EMEA Sovereign and IPF;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.