articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/200518-largest-brazilian-banks-first-quarter-results-point-to-mounting-credit-losses-11486996 content esgSubNav
In This List

Largest Brazilian Banks' First-Quarter Results Point To Mounting Credit Losses


European Financial Stability Facility


Regulatory Reinforcements Loom To Allay Runaway Housing Risks For Australian Banks, Says Report


Leveraged Finance: U.S. Leveraged Finance Q3 2021 Update: Leverage Is Getting Better (Almost) All The Time


North American Financial Institutions Monitor 4Q 2021: Riding The Economy's Tailwind And Aiming For A Smooth Landing

Largest Brazilian Banks' First-Quarter Results Point To Mounting Credit Losses

Even though COVID-19 has reached Latin America later than other regions of the world, its impact was already evident in the largest Brazilian banks' first-quarter 2020 results. The weakening asset quality led them to increase substantially provisions for credit losses, jeopardizing bottom-line results. On the other hand, the coronavirus outbreak had mixed effects on credit growth, given that demand in the corporate sector spiked, while that for consumer products such as credit cards and auto loans stagnated. Banks withdrew their growth projections for 2020 due to a high uncertainty.

We expect banks' asset quality to continue slipping and most likely increase risk of credit in the second quarter of the year, as some government officials estimate the pandemic will peak between June and August in Brazil. We believe companies in vulnerable sectors will likely continue to take a hit, including importers due to Brazil's sharply weaker currency. Moreover, the local authorities continue adopting measures to contain the virus, including quarantine and social-distancing measures, which impair economic activity. This comes as economic conditions were already shaky in the region prior to the global outbreak of coronavirus, while the Brazilian government still has limited fiscal capacity to help the ailing economy. As a result, we now forecast a recession this year with GDP shrinking about 4.6%.

Provisioning Approaching The 2015-2016 Peak

Since 2017, Brazilian banks had been recovering from the domestic financial system's severe slump between late 2014 and 2016, during which provisions for bad loans peaked and caused banks' bottom-line results to decrease. Moreover, loan-loss reserves in 2019 fell to nearly a half of the amount provisioned at the depth of Brazil's recession. This drop was a direct result of improving conditions in the corporate sector and banks' tighter loan underwriting standards and shift away from riskier borrowers. Their portfolio mix also has gradually shifted to less risky products, such as payroll loans and residential mortgages. In addition, banks increased the use of guarantees for corporate and small to midsize enterprise loans.

However, in the first quarter of 2020, combined loan-loss reserves of large banks were around 50% higher than in the quarter a year earlier amid the deteriorating credit conditions in Brazil, because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the pernicious economic impact from its containment measures. This figure was the second largest these banks posted in a single quarter, just behind the September 2015 peak.

Chart 1


Credit Growth Also Picked Up In 2020

Lending growth among Brazil's largest banks reached around 13% year over year in the first quarter of 2020. This was the first time large banks had posted double-digit growth on aggregate since 2015. This was mostly due to the rising volume of corporate loans as companies seek to strengthen working capital cash positions amid the pandemic. Banks, on the other hand, had regulatory incentives to increase lending, given that the central bank approved many measures to increase funding and capital availability through lower reserve deposits and capital requirements. Another important regulatory measure enabled banks to renegotiate existing loans for up to six months without requiring additional provisions that helped maintain the loan portfolio. Retail lending, on the other hand, posted modest growth as demand for some products such as mortgages, credit cards, and auto loans vehicles decreased.

Chart 2


Efficiency Gains And Fee Income To Mitigate The Widening Credit Losses

Efficiency gains bolstered large banks' profitability in the past few years. Stronger efficiency, in turn, stemmed from higher revenues and tight cost control resulted on better efficiency metrics since 2018. Banks continue to focus on cutting administrative expenses, while shrinking their branch networks and expanding digital platforms. Moreover, since 2018, large banks have been increasing the fees and commissions revenue base, which we believe to be more stable than interest income. In our view, despite stalling business activities that require further credit provisions, the high proportion of fees and commissions from non-lending activities will continue to mitigate the likely increase in credit losses among large banks in 2020. Moreover, these entities have a diversified and resilient earnings base, given that they offer a broad spectrum of retail and wholesale banking, asset and wealth management, and insurance services.

Credit Costs Should Continue Depressing Profitability, And Impact Will Likely Be Higher Than In Past Financial Crisis

Chart 3


Large Brazilian banks' profitability already took a big hit in the first quarter of 2020 due to heavy provisioning. However, a sustained drop in economic activity due to the need to maintain a quarantine for a long time could increase the volume of problematic loans sharply and continue to hurt banks' asset quality. If credit losses continue widen beyond the first-quarter levels, we believe the loan-loss reserves to total loans ratio could increase to around 8.5% by year-end. This would be higher than during the 2008-2009 and 2015-2016 financial crises. As a result, return on assets would likely remain below 1%, which is also lower than historical figures. Nevertheless, despite a potential deterioration in stand-alone financial profiles, large banks still have a buffer compared with the sovereign in the form of higher SACPs. Therefore, we expect our ratings on these banks to continue to reflect that on Brazil. The ratings on the sovereign constrain those on the banks given their high exposure in the domestic market. Therefore, we expect their ratings to move in tandem with the sovereign ratings.

Chart 4


This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Guilherme Machado, Sao Paulo (55) 11-3039-9754;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back