articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/200225-credit-estimates-within-middle-market-clos-fourth-quarter-2019-and-overall-year-end-summary-11355835 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

Thank you for your interest in S&P Global Market Intelligence! We noticed you've identified yourself as a student. Through existing partnerships with academic institutions around the globe, it's likely you already have access to our resources. Please contact your professors, library, or administrative staff to receive your student login.

At this time we are unable to offer free trials or product demonstrations directly to students. If you discover that our solutions are not available to you, we encourage you to advocate at your university for a best-in-class learning experience that will help you long after you've completed your degree. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

In This List

Credit Estimates Within Middle Market CLOs: Fourth-Quarter 2019 And Overall Year-End Summary


COVID-19 Impact: Key Takeaways From Our Articles


From Bad To Worse: Global Air Traffic To Drop 60%-70% In 2020

Beyond The Buzz: The Geopolitics Of Water


China Renewables: Delisting To Boost Deleveraging

Credit Estimates Within Middle Market CLOs: Fourth-Quarter 2019 And Overall Year-End Summary

(Editor's Note: This is part of a continuing series highlighting the credit performance and other metrics of middle market loans for which S&P Global Ratings provided credit estimates. The focus of this report is on all middle-market companies for which we provided estimates during a specific quarter and whose loans collateralize middle market collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) we have rated or are in the process of rating.)

S&P Global Ratings rated a total of 31 middle market CLOs in 2019, compared with 28 in 2018. Attractive spreads and this asset class' history of performance brought more investors into the fray. Further, the year also saw the addition of five new middle market managers. These new managers include ones who might have previously managed broadly syndicated CLOs.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, 63 entities refinanced their existing debt, 58 held a leveraged buyout (LBO), 44 used incremental debt to facilitate an acquisition, and 14 executed a dividend recapitalization. On average, entities that refinanced their debt had an average spread over LIBOR of 5.22%, almost 50 basis points less than the 5.70% average spread for all entities in the fourth quarter. The increase in refinancing activity continues to push back the maturity wall for loans in this space. About 62% of the middle-market loans evaluated by S&P Global Ratings in 2019 mature in 2023 or later while short-dated maturities (2020) only comprised 6% of the loans.

In recent years, business and consumer services, technology--software and services, and health care services have dominated sector representation for companies whose loans collateralized middle market CLOs. These three sectors accounted for 50% of credit estimates in 2019 and 47% in 2018. The top 10 sectors in credit estimates were generally the same year over year.

Entities from the railroad and package express, media and entertainment, and oil and gas industries had the highest spreads over LIBOR, reporting average spreads of 6.70%, 6.35%, and 6.33%, respectively. Sectors with the lowest spreads included auto suppliers, metals and mining downstream, and consumer durables, with average spreads of 4.41%, 4.50%, and 4.63%, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2019, one entity from the midstream energy sector had an 8.5% spread over LIBOR.

Due to their high levels of representation, issuers from the business and consumer services, technology--software and services, branded non-durables, and health care services sectors were most likely to have a change in credit estimate and accounted for more than half of the issuers that were either upgraded or downgraded in 2019.

Given their relatively small operating scale and the fragmented nature of the markets they operate in, the majority of entities for which we produce credit estimates result in a vulnerable business risk profile. Also, the private equity nature of ownership with high leverage puts the credit estimate score at the low end of the spectrum. A total of 77% of entities we reviewed received a score of 'b-' in 2019, which is comparable with the 77% seen in 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2019, investors with capital in the 'ccc' category received an average spread of 6.3% over LIBOR, about 70 basis points higher than the average spread of 5.6% over LIBOR that characterized the single 'b' entities. Credit estimates in the fourth quarter of 2019 showed minimal narrowing in spreads compared with the third quarter 2019 because the average spread over LIBOR for entities reviewed moved to 5.7% in the fourth quarter from 5.8% in the third quarter.

Nearly 12% of the credit estimates completed for 2019 had a score in the 'ccc' category. This is similar to 2018, in which credit estimates in the 'ccc' category also accounted for 12% of the total. In 2019, approximately three-fourths of credit estimates that received a 'ccc' score received a 'ccc+', signaling vulnerability and dependence on favorable economic conditions; however, we did not envision defaults over the next 12 months. In this category, 31 of the entities received a 'ccc' score, signaling a potential default over the next 12 months, and nine received a 'ccc-' score, signaling a potential default within the next six months.

The median debt to EBITDA for credit estimates in the 'ccc' category was 13x. For those credit estimates, only 36% of the entities had adequate liquidity, 48% had less than adequate liquidity, and 16% had weak liquidity, reflecting a material deficit in sources of liquidity and a likelihood of a covenant breach.

Of the 98 entities downgraded in 2019, 76 were downgraded into the 'ccc' category due to an increase in leverage, liquidity pressures, and potential inability to refinance oncoming debt. In 2019, 76 entities received upgrades due to performance improvements, including reduced leverage from debt pay downs and improved earnings. After a notable increase in EBITDA, 25 of these entities received upgrades out of the 'ccc' category to 'b-'. These entities experienced a median increase in EBITDA of 76% since their last review.

Chart 1


Chart 2


Chart 3


Chart 4


Table 1

Credit Estimate Upgrades And Downgrades By Sector, 2019
Sector Upgraded Sector Downgraded
Business & consumer services 13 Business & consumer services 20
Technology--software & services 12 Technology--software & services 15
Branded non-durables 7 Branded non-durables 11
Health care services 7 Health care services 10
Media and entertainment 4 Building materials 5
Auto suppliers 3 Retail & restaurants 5
Building materials 3 Aerospace & defense 4
Consumer durables 3 Capital goods 4
Health care equipment & supplies 3 Media and entertainment 4
Oil & gas 3 Auto suppliers 3
Capital goods 2 Health care equipment & supplies 3
Containers & packaging 2 Specialty chemicals 3
Environmental services 2 Technology--hardware & semiconductors 3
Retail & restaurants 2 Leisure and sports 2
Technology--hardware & semiconductors 2 Pharmaceuticals 2
Aerospace & defense 1 Environmental services 1
Commodity chemicals 1 Railroads & package express 1
Leisure and sports 1 Telecommunications & cable 1
Pharmaceuticals 1 Transportation infrastructure 1
Real estate investment trusts 1
Specialty chemicals 1
Telecommunications & cable 1
Transportation--cyclical 1
Total upgrades 76 Total downgrades 98

Chart 5


Chart 6


Chart 7


Chart 8


Chart 9


Chart 10


Chart 11


Chart 12


This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Stewart M Webster, New York + 1 (212) 438 8619;
Secondary Contacts:Tejaswini Tungare, Toronto;
Zoya Alam, New York;
Analytical Manager:Ramki Muthukrishnan, New York (1) 212-438-1384;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back