articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/191010-for-the-fmi-industry-global-m-a-remains-an-elusive-and-for-now-unnecessary-dream-11190247 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *

* Required

In This List
COMMENTS

For The FMI Industry, Global M&A Remains An Elusive And, For Now, Unnecessary Dream


For The FMI Industry, Global M&A Remains An Elusive And, For Now, Unnecessary Dream

One month ago, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s (HKEX's) proposal to merge with London Stock Exchange Group PLC (LSEG) took the market by surprise. Its decision this week not to proceed with a firm offer is less surprising. It comes amid resistance by LSEG's board, a presumably lukewarm reception from LSEG shareholders, and understandable investor concerns that any deal would be torpedoed by one or more governments on national-interest grounds. If the deal had gone through, it might have spurred a wave of similar deals, like the chain reaction of activity we saw in 2007 and 2011. For now, however, it seems that global M&A remains unfashionable in the financial market infrastructure (FMI) industry.

The two parties will now pursue their separate paths. For HKEX, its "China Anchored, Globally Connected and Technology Empowered" strategy would see it reinforce its position as a leading global venue for capital raising and the pre-eminent channel for capital market investment flows into and out of China. For LSEG, its strategy increasingly marries solid organic growth opportunities with its big thinking on data and redefinition of what "market infrastructure" means in the future. All eyes remain on its mega-merger with Refinitiv—a bold transaction, warmly welcomed by most shareholders, that would see it temporarily countenance significant financial leverage to bridge into the parallel information services industry.

The HKEX proposal raised an important latent question for the industry--how to best link up investment pools across the major global financial centers, particularly the mainland Chinese stockmarkets. At an aggregate $8 trillion these rank second globally by market capitalization, though remain distant to the huge $34 trillion U.S. market. For now, HKEX remains a key gatekeeper and conduit via its Stock and Bond Connect links into the Chinese exchanges. London and Deutsche Boerse offer alternative visions: London has direct links to Shanghai via the cross-issuance of depository receipts and Deutsche Boerse operates the China Europe International Exchange joint venture with two Chinese exchanges, but for now activity remains low. The slow-moving and unresolved question of connecting investment pools persists, not least given the very gradual moves to ease Chinese capital controls. The current set up looks likely to remain for many years to come.

Chart 1

image

Cross-regional acquisitions of trophy assets remain politically charged. They might yet happen, but we consider this unlikely in the coming years. Instead, we expect a continuation of the trends that have been shaping the FMI industry over the past several years--solid organic growth in faster-growing, developing economies, gradual in-market consolidation in mature economies, and acquisitions in high growth segments for those that can afford it.

Acquiring Trophy FMI Assets Remains An Uphill Task

Whereas clearinghouses are arguably the most systemically important FMIs given their critical role as the market's counterparty, stock exchanges remain of special interest to governments. Central to their financial ecosystem, they embody capitalism, and every capitalist economy has its own one.

Cross-border acquisitions are sometimes permitted (NYSE/Euronext in 2007, Nasdaq/OMX and LSEG/Borsa Italiana both in 2008) as is some consolidation (Euronext being the original and still vibrant European example). However, over the past decade there have been more failed deals (DBAG/LSEG several times, with DBAG/NYSE Euronext, ASX/SGX and LSEG/TMX all in 2011) than successful ones. Indeed, the only successful cross-regional examples (HKEX/LME and SGX/Baltic Exchange) were in less politically sensitive asset classes (metals and freight). LSEG CEO David Schwimmer said in June this year, "It's hard to think about doing big cross-border exchange-type transactions. It just feels difficult for the industry." While other considerations played a leading part in its decision, HKEX would have had to overcome these political hurdles to get a deal over the line.

Solid Fundamentals Remain, But Mixed Fortunes Lie Ahead

Generally, we see FMIs as providers of investment, risk management, and data services. Their key disciplines are the creation of standardized, reliable investment product, the maintenance of resilient and flexible technology, and the provision of fast, reliable data. It remains a great business to be in for FMIs' equity and debt investors alike: highly cash-generative, typical 43%-66% EBITDA margins (and sometimes higher), defendable market positions (aided by regulation and investors' imperative to interact where liquidity pools most strongly), and fairly resilient through the cycle earnings. S&P Global Ratings continues to see this industry as an 'AA'/'A' one (for the major players) before significant leverage is added.

Chart 2

image

However, the industry's focus has changed markedly over the past five years. In faster-growing markets such as Brazil and Hong Kong, we see still robust, though cyclical, growth opportunities in equities and fixed income (cash and derivatives). In Europe and the U.S., stock-market capitalization remains buoyed by cheap money. However, these markets have irreversibly fragmented, and growth opportunities are now quite limited for many traditional FMIs. With some exceptions such as NASDAQ, new listings have stalled or are declining, trading volumes are under increasing pressure as tighter regulation curtails banks' ability to intermediate flows, and lower-for-longer interest rates and low volatility are impeding trading activity. Some derivatives exchanges, like CME, remain huge magnets for activity on their marquee contracts, but the development of golden eggs (new, highly popular, and profitable derivatives contracts) remains rare.

So If Not Global M&A, Then What?

European and U.S. FMIs remain positively exposed to cyclical upside if interest rates normalize, economies strengthen, and volatility becomes persistent rather than sporadic. Though volatility might rise, we expect none of these tailwinds to arrive anytime soon--indeed risks are stacked in the opposite direction. These FMIs will likely show high resilience even in a cyclical downturn, probably even more so than during the financial crisis, but growth from traditional channels will become harder to achieve.

The good news is that several strong secular growth trends have provided ample growth opportunities for those able to seize them. This will likely continue irrespective of the cyclical outturn. Furthermore, some of these trends offer a route to increase, sometimes dramatically, the weight of the industry's annuity-like revenues, away from its traditional substantial reliance on volume-driven earnings. They have also allowed some true geographic diversification of earnings, without offending perceived national interests.

FMIs' ability to seize these opportunities has been a function of incumbency or existing strengths and capabilities, strategic thinking, and investment capacity. Size and leverage appetite also matter, for this is a hugely acquisitive sector where the deepest pockets tend to win the battle for assets that trade on high multiples.

More than most, LSEG and ICE have ridden this wave--marrying a stream of acquisitions centered on indices, data, and (for LSEG) clearing to show strong growth in earnings and capitalization and greater diversification. For the first time, and due to its now market-leading earnings multiple, LSEG now has larger capitalization than Deutsche Boerse, and ICE now sits alongside acquisition-shy CME and HKEX as the global big beasts (in market cap terms). We recognized LSEG's strong track record and disciplined leverage appetite when we upgraded the company in May 2019 (see "London Stock Exchange Group PLC Upgraded To 'A/A-1'; LCH Ltd. And LCH SA Upgraded To 'AA-/A-1+'; Outlook Stable"). Assuming that the Refinitiv deal completes, we would expect to lower our ratings on LSEG (and its LCH subsidiaries) due to the associated sustained rise in leverage, but we anticipate that its good track record on post-acquisition integrations will help to mitigate related execution risks (see "London Stock Exchange Group PLC, LCH Ltd, And LCH S.A. Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Proposed Refinitiv Deal," published Aug. 1, 2019).

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

For traditional, often smaller, players in slower markets like Europe, strong earnings growth is harder to find. In a largely fixed-cost business, operating expenses cannot be easily cut--though Euronext has been remarkably successful in reducing costs and improving its EBITDA margin ever since ICE divested it after its 2013 acquisition of NYSE. LCH too has become far more efficient in recent years thanks to cost-saving initiatives and strong revenue growth.

Already a product of regional consolidation itself in 2000, Euronext has recently acquired the Irish Stock Exchange and Oslo Bors. In-market consolidation has also been a feature in the U.S. (CBOE/BATS, NASDAQ/ISE, ICE/NYSE), Brazil (B3/Cetip), Russia (MICEX/RTS) and Japan (Tokyo/Osaka). While not rapid, it will likely continue, as long as shareholders and national authorities appreciate the benefits, and increasing imperative, of greater scale.

By contrast, it remains rare that the major players make divestments. Deutsche Boerse sold ISE, its underperforming U.S. stock options business in 2016, but since reinvested in GTX and Axioma. SIX Group sold out of its STOXX and Eurex joint ventures with Deutsche Boerse, and recently folded its payments business into Worldline, though it continues to hold a sizable stake.

Related Research

  • Bulletin: Hong Kong Exchanges' Surprise Merger Offer To London Stock Exchange Group Has No Immediate Rating Impact, Sep. 11, 2019
  • Bulletin: Refinitiv Ratings Not Immediately Affected By Hong Kong Exchanges' Merger Offer To London Stock Exchange Group, Sep. 11, 2019
  • London Stock Exchange Group PLC, Aug. 28, 2019
  • London Stock Exchange Group PLC, LCH Ltd, And LCH S.A. Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Proposed Refinitiv Deal, Aug. 1, 2019
  • U.S. FMIs Should Be Resilient Despite A Tough Start To The Year, But Regulation Could Pose Challenges, Aug. 1, 2019
  • London Stock Exchange Group PLC Upgraded To 'A/A-1'; LCH Ltd. And LCH SA Upgraded To 'AA-/A-1+'; Outlook Stable, May 21, 2019
  • Financial Market Infrastructure Players Are Greedy For Growth Yet Leverage Appetite Remains Restrained, Aug. 29, 2018

Appendix

Table 1

Selected FMI industry M&A transactions in the past decade
Target Line(s) of business Domicile X-border? Year announced Acquirer Approx. consideration ($ mil).
Cetip Clearing/CSD Brazil N 2016 B3 293
Chi-X Europe Trading (cash equities) UK Y 2011 BATS 300
Direct Edge Trading (cash equities) US N 2013 BATS N.A.
Hotspot Trading (FX) US N 2015 BATS 365
BATS Listing, trading (equities) US N 2016 CBOE 3,200
Nymex Trading (energy) US N 2008 CME 7,700
NEX Group Trading (bonds, FX), data UK Y 2018 CME 4,774
EEX / Powernext Trading/clearing (energy, emissions) Germany N 2011 DBAG N.A.
Eurex # Trading/clearing Germany N 2011 DBAG 647
STOXX/Indexium # Data/indices Germany N 2015 DBAG 646
360T Trading (FX) Germany N 2015 DBAG 795
GTX ECN platform Trading (FX) US Y 2018 DBAG 100
Axioma Data/analytics US Y 2019 DBAG 850
Nordic CSD CSD Sweden/Finland Y 2008 Euroclear n.a.
FastMatch Trading (FX) US Y 2017 Euronext 153
iBabs Corporate solutions Netherlands Y 2017 Euronext 33
Irish Stock Exchange Listing, trading (equities, bonds) Ireland Y 2018 Euronext 174
Oslo Bors Listing, trading (equities, bonds), CSD Norway Y 2019 Euronext 762
London Metal Exchange Trading & clearing (metals) UK Y 2012 HKEx 1,714
Climate Exchange PLC Trading (energy, emissions) UK Y 2010 ICE 483
NYSE Euronext Listing, trading, clearing, CSD US N 2013 ICE 8,200
SuperDerivatives Data/indices US N 2014 ICE 350
Trayport Data/indices US N 2015 ICE 650
Interactive Data Corp. Data/indices US N 2015 ICE 5,200
BondPoint Trading (Fixed-Income) US N 2017 ICE 400
BAML Index business Indices US N 2017 ICE N.A.
TMC Trading (Fixed-Income) US N 2018 ICE 685
Borsa Italiana Listing, trading, clearing, CSD Italy Y 2008 LSEG 1,788
Turquoise § Trading (cash equities) UK N 2008 LSEG 7,650
FTSE # Data/indices UK N 2011 LSEG 551
LCH.Clearnet** Clearing UK N 2013 LSEG 577
TMX bond indices Data/indices Canada Y 2013 LSEG 88
Russell Data/indices US Y 2014 LSEG 2,700
Mergent Inc Data/indices US Y 2016 LSEG 144
Citi FI indices / The Yield Book Data/indices US Y 2017 LSEG 685
Vocalink Settlement system UK Y 2016 Mastercard 857
RTS Listing, trading (equities) Russia N 2011 MICEX N.A.
OMX Listing, trading, clearing Sweden Y 2007 NASDAQ 2,530
Boston SE Trading (options) US N 2007 NASDAQ 61
Philadelphia SE Trading (options) US N 2007 NASDAQ 652
NordPool Trading & clearing (energy, freight, salmon) Norway Y 2010 NASDAQ 238
eSpeed Trading (bonds) US N 2013 NASDAQ 1,200
ISE Trading (stock options) US N 2016 NASDAQ 1,100
eVestment Data/indices US N 2017 NASDAQ 705
Braintree Payment solutions US N 2013 PayPal 800

Venmo

Payment solutions US N 2013 PayPal 800
TIO Networks Payment processor Canada Y 2017 PayPal 228
iZettle Payment technology and solutions Sweden Y 2018 PayPal 2,200
Baltic Exchange Trading (freight) UK Y 2016 SGX 87
Cetrel SA Payments processing Luxembourg Y 2008 SIX N.A.
Oslo Clearing Clearing Norway Y 2012 SIX 20
Paylife Payment services Austria Y 2013 SIX 110
Aduno Payment services Switzerland N 2017 SIX 2,012
Swiss Euro Clearing Bank Payments processing Germany Y 2018 SIX N.A.
Trayport Data/indices Canada Y 2017 TMX Group 673
Osaka Securities Exchange Trading & clearing (derivatives) Japan N 2011 Tokyo SE 1,209
VISA Europe Card schemes UK Y 2016 VISA 23,256
Source: S&P Global Ratings. Consideration converted using midpoint rate effective Oct. 9, 2019 (source: oanda.com). N.A.--consideration remains undisclosed. # Acquisitons were for a residual 50% stake not already owned. §Acqisition of 60% stake. **Acquisition of initial 58% stake. LSEG has since acquired a further 25% in several tranches.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Giles Edwards, London (44) 20-7176-7014;
giles.edwards@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Thierry Grunspan, New York (1) 212-438-1441;
thierry.grunspan@spglobal.com
William Edwards, London (44) 20-7176-3359;
william.edwards@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Fabrizio Serafini, London;
Fabrizio.Serafini@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back