The race to turn the world's car fleet climate friendly will continue to heat up over the next five years. European regulatory demands to cut CO2 emissions by another 15% by 2025 will require a big push by automakers for more electric cars and a significant mind-shift by customers. Electrified cars will be crucial in reducing CO2 emissions until fuel cell or other technologies might bring additional benefits.
German car manufacturers are preparing stealthily for this industry transformation. By the end of this year, the three big premium automakers Volkswagen, BMW, and Daimler will offer at least one fully battery electric vehicle (BEV) and at least one plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) in nearly all their existing models--totaling 38 electrified models. But the R&D costs for developing these cars are large, and extra investment in supply chain and technology developments will weigh on profitability in the coming years.
On the path to electrification, we think Germany's premium car segments will be able to leverage their strengths of higher profitability than mass producers and somewhat lower sensitivity to demand shocks. These strengths have to date supported the current ratings in the 'A' category at Daimler and BMW and in the 'BBB' category for VW. However, disruptive industry trends and the deterioration of market conditions globally may strain their profitability over a prolonged period and trigger rating transition. While U.S. automaker Tesla is currently the bestseller in the premium electric vehicle (EV) market, we expect German carmakers will exert a strong challenge by building on their brand reputation, ability to produce high-quality cars at scale, and consumer loyalty. Signs are that high-performance "green" cars are an increasingly important element of brand reputation for German premium car customers.
German Manufacturers Ramp Up Electric Vehicle Production
The big three German carmakers still have some catching up to do in the electrification race, but are picking up pace. BMW, VW, and Daimler (maker of Mercedes-Benz) together had captured only a 12.5% market share of the 2.1 million fully battery electric cars (BEVs) sold globally last year--itself only a fraction of all car sales. BMW is leading the German players with 140,000 electric cars sold in 2018, making it the fifth-largest seller of BEVs (see chart 1). While this is behind market leader Tesla, BMW has a larger market share in electric cars compared to its overall market. VW Group, with 80,000 unit sales, was also among the top 10 sellers of BEVs in 2018, followed by Daimler with 45,000 EV unit sales. All three target meaningful increases in their BEV sales this year, particularly VW, which is aiming for a 37.5% rise to 110,000.
VW is opting for a dedicated electric vehicle platform (MEB), mainly for its SEAT, Skoda, and Volkswagen brands, and has won Ford as a partner to use this platform in Europe with the aim of increasing volumes and reducing unitary fixed costs. The other two German competitors will take a flexible approach to platforms. The heaviest competition in terms of sales will come from Tesla and Chinese producers BYD, BAIC, SAIC, and Geely, although they are limited to their home markets. Daimler and VW have established partnerships with Chinese automakers, and Geely is among Daimler's most important shareholders, supporting their competitive positions.
We expect the breakthrough for German carmakers in electrification this year to come not just from BEV but from plug-in electric hybrids--vehicles that allow drivers to switch from battery-driven short trips to traditional internal combustion engines (ICE) for longer journeys. This includes mild hybrids--cars with small batteries that optimize fuel consumption and could prevent potential ICE bans in city centers. German manufacturers already have 38 such models on the road or launching this year, and will add another 23 next year (see table 1). VW has the most ambitious plans of the three: it promises to launch 50 new BEVs and 30 PHEVs by 2025, which could make it the largest supplier of EVs by that time.
|German Manufacturers Offer Electric Alternatives In Nearly All Their Main Car Series|
|2-Series||i3||3-Series||iX3||C-Class*||EQC||CLA coupe||EQA||Golf GTE||e-up!||Leon||ID.3*|
|3-Series||Mini Electric||X1||E-Class*||fortwo*||CLA shooting brake||EQV||Passat GTE*||e-Golf||Tarraco||ID.CROZZ|
|X5||F-Cell||eSprinter||AMG GT 73e||A7||e-Crafter||SUPERB|
|Mini SE All 4||A-Class sedan||Q5||Vision IV|
|*Several editions on the market.|
We expect plug-in hybrids and mild hybrids to play a key role in German carmakers' strategy to meet increasingly more stringent emissions regulations, especially in Europe, over the next decade. This is because PHEV versions of their upper-middle class models typically emit two-thirds less CO2 than the same models with traditional ICE (see chart 2). At just 5% to 15% more expensive than traditional versions, they are increasingly popular with customers. Nevertheless, in the first half of 2019, sales of PHEVs fell 7% in the EU while mild hybrids and BEVs grew 36.5% and 90%, respectively, according to the European automakers association ACEA.
However, to meet the much more stringent EU targets to cut CO2 emissions by 37.5% by 2030 from the 2021 baseline, we expect carmakers will have to increase BEVs significantly, which could be difficult. One obstacle is the high cost of batteries. EVs could become more attractive to customers if battery prices come down in the next few years, as many industry experts predict (see chart 3). In addition, possible regulatory penalties on ICE cars could make BEV cars more attractive. Among the biggest uncertainties for carmakers is the current misalignment between stakeholders involved in shaping the future of mobility--including infrastructure, commercial real estate developers, and urban planning agencies. This ends up pushing a large part of the burden of this transition onto the auto industry, which is already experiencing various issues related to funding technology developments, setting up a sustainable supply chain in every key market, and determining production strategies that enable minimal unitary fixed costs.
Luxury Electric Cars Are Becoming Hot Property
While manufacturers are rapidly expanding their model mix of PHEV and BEV, the question is whether electric car brands can win customers' motoring hearts as well as their eco minds. The proportion of electrified cars on the road is likely to remain small over the next five years (see chart 4). We expect that the percentage of electric cars sold by the three German manufacturers will vary between 25% and 40% by 2025.
The heavy price premium for an electric car still deters most customers. This is especially the case in the mass market--defined as cars priced below €30,000--where electric versions can be doubly as expensive as conventional engines, and are therefore not an affordable option for most buyers (see chart 5). But the price premium for luxury electric cars is less stark and therefore less of a hurdle. A Mercedes E-Class or BMW 5-Series plug-in hybrid is priced only about 10%-15% above the comparable ICE version. However, fully electric cars, such as the Mercedes EQC, Audi E-tron, or VW ID.3, do not have directly comparable ICE models.
Yet, there are signs that car buyers are starting to warm up to electric cars, especially in Germany. In the first seven months of 2019, EV sales in Germany grew by 87%, and about 7% of all newly registered cars in Germany were electrified.
A big impetus of this change is growing customer demand in the premium segment. Porsche recently said it already has more than 30,000 pre-orders for its new electric car Taycan, which will launch in 2020--more than it expects to sell of its iconic 911. The Mercedes EQC is also receiving positive market buzz. One attraction for luxury sports car buyers is the performance advantage: electric cars often provide faster acceleration than comparable ICE cars. High performance alongside "green" credentials are helping premium carmakers build on brand promise.
High R&D Costs Will Hit Profitability And May Harm Ratings
Electrification is costing the auto industry dearly in R&D investment and capital investments for new or upgraded production lines, and this will likely continue to depress profits over the next three to five years. VW was the world's third-largest spender on R&D in 2018, behind Amazon and Alphabet, while Toyota, Ford, GM, Daimler, Honda, and BMW were also among the top 25, according to a PWC Global Innovation 1000 study. The auto sector is the largest contributor to R&D in the EU (28%), with average spending exceeding €50 billion per year (source: ACEA). We believe that manufacturers' intention to reduce R&D spending over time is one of the main factors behind industry consolidation. We also expect that manufacturers will reduce capex spending on ICE developments and increase the spending for electrified and other alternative drives in the coming years.
The higher cost of batteries is the main reason why electric cars are currently also meaningfully more expensive to produce. Although the price per kilowatt-hour (KWh) has been declining rapidly--from about $1,000 in 2010 to about $190 in 2018--it will likely only reach breakeven with the combustion engine car at about $100/KWh, which we expect will be achieved only through further optimization and production scale in 2022-2024. For larger cars, in particular, the crossover point will likely come in 2022, according to Bloomberg NEF.
One competitive advantage the German car manufacturers have over competitors such as Tesla, however, is their relatively high production volumes in the premium segment (see chart 7). Tesla, nevertheless, has the advantage of insourcing battery production.
Premium carmakers' use of PHEVs to ease the transition to electrification should also protect profitability margins because batteries are relatively small and less expensive than BEVs, and the cost can largely be passed through to customers.
Over the past seven years, the profitability of premium carmakers was higher and less volatile than mass manufacturers (see chart 8). We expect this trend to continue over the coming years. Still, their profitability will likely stay lower than in the past because they will need to invest in other new technologies, such as self-driving and battery cells. Longer-term lower profitability levels would drag on ratings over time.
Financial Services Units Will Help Develop The EV Market
As the electric car market develops, German premium manufacturers' strength in leasing and financial services through their captive finance entities will also make them particularly well placed to benefit. We believe customers will be increasingly attracted to car leasing to alleviate risks surrounding higher entry prices (especially at mass-market brands), performance, and resale risks of electric models (see chart 9). German car manufacturers' financial services arms will likely base their marketing and commercial strategies on the full ownership costs for electric cars for customers. As a result, we expect that they will gain greater exposure to residual value risk, which could weigh on their ratings.
(Research contributor: Patrick Wolf)
- European Corporate Credit Outlook Mid-Year 2019 A Switch In Time?, July 25, 2019
- In Europe's Auto Market It’s All About Curbing CO2 Emissions, June 17, 2019
- Credit FAQ: Questions Over Electric Vehicle Residual Values In European Auto ABS, May 31, 2019
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Tobias Mock, CFA, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-126;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Vittoria Ferraris, Milan (39) 02-72111-207;|
|Eve Seiltgens, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-124;|
|Anna Stegert, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-128;|
|Matthias J Raab, CFA, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-122;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.