The U.S. distress ratio--defined as the proportion of speculative-grade issues with option-adjusted composite spreads of more than 1,000 basis points (bps) relative to U.S. Treasuries--decreased to 6.2% as of July 15, 2019, from 6.8% as of June 17. Since last month's report, the distress ratios of seven of the 10 sectors fell. The three sectors with rising distress ratios this month were capital goods, media and entertainment, and telecommunications. The narrowing distress ratio is a sign of conditions in anticipation of reduced interest rates, which were in fact cut by 25 bps on July 31. Lower borrowing costs should prove beneficial for lower-rated issuers, as additional cash will be available to investors, lowering the risk of default.
Credit Risks Emerge For Lower-Rated Oil And Gas Issuers
The overall U.S. speculative-grade composite spread contracted to 475 bps as of July 17 from 494 bps as of June 17. The spread reached its highest point in 2019 right at the start of the year--Jan. 3--when it reached 578 bps (see Chart 2). The spreads remain well above the one-year moving average of 451 bps but are lower than the five-year moving average of 516 bps.
The overall U.S. speculative-grade composite spread has tightened since May, and the overall distress ratio remains low. However, risk remains in the oil and gas sector, which leads with an 18.4% distress ratio and 33 distressed credits. So far in 2019, credit spreads in the sector widened to 349 bps from 301 bps in February and 231bps in July 2018, signaling risk of funding for lower-rated issuers in the sector (see Chart 2). A number of issuers with distressed issues will face refinancing risks in the short term if financing conditions do not improve, including Unit Corp., Denbury Resources Inc., California Resources Corp., and Pioneer Energy Services Corp. In addition, S&P Global Ratings lowered its Henry Hub natural gas price assumption for the remainder of 2019, 2020 and 2021, further adding to the heightened refinancing risk (see "S&P Global Ratings Lowered Its Henry Hub Natural Gas Price Assumption For The Rest Of 2019 And For 2020, 2021; Long-Term U.S. Natural Gas, Canadian AECO, And Crude Oil Price Assumptions Unchanged," July 29, 2019).
By rating category, spreads have narrowed in 2019 for all rating categories except 'CCC' (see Chart 3). The 'CCC' spread has remained at 917 bps, higher than its one-year average of 880 bps, further signaling additional risks for the lowest-rated issuers looking for cash in the short term.
Downgrade Potential Is Still A Concern For The Oil And Gas Sector
By sector, the oil and gas, retail and restaurants, telecommunications, insurance, and forest products and building materials sectors have distress ratio above the overall U.S. distress ratio (see Chart 2). The negative bias (measured by the proportion of ratings with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch with negative implications) of the oil and gas sector greatly exceeds its long-term average. Along with the oil and gas sector, the telecommunications also has higher current negative bias than its long-term negative bias, indicating heightened short-term risk (see Table 1).
|The Oil And Gas, Retail, And Telecommunications Sectors Have The Highest Distress Ratios And Cover Almost 62% Of All Distressed Credits. Among The Top Three, Oil And Gas And Telecommunications Face Higher Downgrade Potential.|
|Distress ratio (%)||Current negative bias (%)||Long-term average of negative bias* (%)|
|Oil and gas||18.4||24.8||19.0|
|*Negative bias is calculated as the number of U.S. issuers with either a negative outlook or ratings on CreditWatch negative, divided by the total number of U.S. issuers with either positive, negative, or stable outlook or ratings on CreditWatch positive or negative. The long-term average is taken from 1990 to the present. The proportion of 'B-' and lower issues is measured relative to the total number of speculative-grade issues. The statistic is calculated for instruments issued in the U.S. during the trailing three years. The proportion of 'B-' and lower U.S. issuers is measured relative to the total number of U.S. speculative-grade issuers. Data through July 15, 2019. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.|
The variability in the distress ratio--along with other economic, financial, and credit-related factors--generally corresponds with changes in default rates. For example, the sharp decline in the default rate of energy companies over the past two years has contributed to the decline in the overall distress ratio (see Chart 1).
The economic indicators continued to remain positive in the second quarter of 2019. The Industrial Production Index remained at 109.6 as of June 2019, and the unemployment rate tightened marginally to 3.7% in June from 3.8% as of March 2019. Financial indicators such as the distress ratio and the speculative-grade composite spread have both contracted. However, risk remains, as the slope of the yield curve inverted for the first time since the last economic downturn in March and has remained inverted to its current level of 0.15 as of June 30. Although the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) widened by the end of the second quarter to 15.1%, it has declined to 12.7% as of July 15, 2019. The ratio of issuers rated 'B-' or below to total speculative-grade issuers has been rising gradually, to 19.1% by the end of second quarter from 17.7% in the previous quarter, opening gap for probabilities of default. In addition, the downgrade ratio (the share of rating actions that were downgrades) and U.S. corporate defaults each rose to their highest quarterly levels since 2016 at 67%.
Overall, the U.S. speculative-grade default rate tightened to 2.3% as of May 31, 2019, but the U.S. default tally rose to its highest level since the second quarter of 2017. With this uptick in defaults, S&P Global Ratings Research expects the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to reach 2.7% by March 2020, up from 2.1% as of March 2019 2018. Following the 2008 recession, the U.S. speculative-grade default rate bottomed out at 1.96% in September 2011, and then it eventually hit its apex of 5% at the beginning of 2017 before dropping to 2.3% as of May 31, 2019.
|Seven Sectors Experienced Drops In Distressed Credits In May; As A Result, The Overall Distress Ratio Is Down To 6.2%|
|Number of distresssed issues||Distress ratio* (%)||Distribution of distressed credits (%)||Total debt affected (Mil. $)||Difference in % of distressed credits (month-over-month)||Debt-based distress ratio (%)||% change of distressed credits by sector|
|Forest products and building materials||4||6.9||3.6||1,025.0||1.1||4.6||33.3|
|Homebuilders/real estate cos.||4||5.7||3.6||1,020.0||(0.5)||4.0||(20.0)|
|Media and entertainment||5||2.1||4.5||3,204.0||1.2||2.2||25.0|
|Metals, mining, and steel||2||3.4||1.8||875.0||0.2||2.9||0.0|
|Oil and gas||33||18.4||30.0||14,850.0||0.0||17.4||(8.3)|
|*The S&P Global Rating distress ratio is defined as the number of speculative-grade issues with option-adjusted spreads above 1,000 bps to the total number of speculative-grade issues. ¶Outstanding debt amount associated with distressed issues divided by the total debt outstanding of speculative-grade issues. Distribution of distressed credits is defined as the distribution, by sector, within all speculative-grade issues with option-adjusted spreads above 1,000 bps. Data as of July 15, 2019. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.|
|List Of Distressed Credits By Issuers|
|Sector/company||Issuer ratings are for a related entity||Number of issues||Outstanding amount (Mil. $)||Rating||Outlook/CreditWatch|
|Optimas OE Solutions Inc.||Yes||1||225.0||B-||Stable|
|Vertiv Intermediate Holding Corp.||Yes||1||500.0||B||Negative|
|Dean Foods Co.||1||700.0||CCC+||Negative|
|High Ridge Brands Co.||1||250.0||CCC-||Negative|
|Kronos Acquisition Holdings Inc.||1||890.0||CCC+||Stable|
|Pyxus International Inc.||1||635.4||CCC+||Negative|
|Revlon Consumer Products Corp.||1||450.0||CCC+||Negative|
|CNG Holdings Inc.||1||310.0||B||Stable|
|Freedom Mortgage Corp.||1||250.0||B-||Stable|
|PHH Mortgage Corp.||1||330.9||B-||Negative|
|Populus Financial Group Inc.||1||315.0||B||Stable|
|Forest products and building materials|
|Apex Tool Group LLC||1||325.0||B-||Stable|
|Northwest Hardwoods Inc.||2||435.0||CCC||Negative|
|Werner FinCo LP||1||265.0||B||Negative|
|Air Methods Corp.||1||500.0||B-||Stable|
|CHS/Community Health Systems Inc.||Yes||3||5755.9||CCC+||Negative|
|Quorum Health Corp.||1||400.0||CCC||Negative|
|Pitney Bowes Inc.||1||375.0||BB+||Negative|
|Riverbed Technology Inc.||1||392.4||B-||Negative|
|Homebuilders/real estate cos.|
|K. Hovnanian Enterprises Inc.||Yes||4||1020.0||CCC+||Negative|
|One Call Corp.||1||228.0||CCC||Negative|
|The Nassau Cos. of New York||1||252.8||B||Negative|
|Media and entertainment|
|APX Group Inc.||Yes||2||854.3||B-||Stable|
|Exela Intermediate Co. LLC||Yes||1||1000.0||B-||Negative|
|Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.||1||800.0||B-||Stable|
|Realogy Group LLC||1||550.0||BB-||Negative|
|Metals, mining, and steel|
|Foresight Energy Finance Corp.||Yes||1||425.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Hi-Crush Partners LP||1||450.0||B-||Positive|
|Oil and gas|
|Alta Mesa Holdings L.P.||1||500.0||CCC-||Negative|
|Basic Energy Services Inc.||1||300.0||B-||Negative|
|Bruin E&P Partners LLC||1||600.0||B||Stable|
|Calfrac Holdings LP||Yes||1||650.0||B-||Stable|
|California Resources Corp.||2||244.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Chaparral Energy Inc.||1||300.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Comstock Resources Inc.||1||849.9||B||Stable|
|Covey Park Finance Corp.||Yes||1||600.0||B||Stable|
|Denbury Resources Inc.||6||1368.4||CCC+||Negative|
|Eclipse Resources Corp.||1||510.5||B-||Stable|
|EP Energy LLC||5||3112.0||CCC-||Negative|
|Great Western Finance Corp.||Yes||1||300.0||B-||Stable|
|Halcon Resources Corp.||1||623.9||CC||Negative|
|Jonah Energy LLC||1||600.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Lonestar Resources America Inc.||1||250.0||B-||Stable|
|Pioneer Energy Services Corp.||1||300.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Rowan Cos. Inc.||1||360.8||B-||Negative|
|Sanchez Energy Corp.||2||1550.0||CCC||Negative|
|Tapstone Energy LLC||1||300.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Vine Oil & Gas LP||2||880.0||B||Stable|
|Beverages & More Inc.||1||190.0||CCC+||Negative|
|Guitar Center Inc.||1||311.0||CCC+||Negative|
|J.C. Penney Co. Inc.||3||822.3||CCC+||Negative|
|J.C. Penney Corp. Inc.||2||788.3||CCC+||Negative|
|Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC||5||1915.6||CCC||Negative|
|Rite Aid Corp.||1||295.0||B-||Negative|
|The Fresh Market||1||800.0||CCC||Negative|
|Frontier Communications Corp.||17||10725.6||CCC||Negative|
|GTT Communications Inc.||1||575.0||B-||Stable|
|HC2 Holdings Inc.||1||470.0||B-||Stable|
|United States Cellular Corp.||2||575.0||BB||Stable|
|Navios Acquisition Finance (US) Inc.||1||670.0||B-||Stable|
|Ferrellgas Finance Corp.||Yes||2||975.0||CCC||Negative|
|*Issuer rating used is of a related entity. Data as of July 15, 2019. The list excludes companies with confidential ratings. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.|
- Few Corporate Defaults In 2018, But Pockets Of Distress Have Since Emerged, Jul 23, 2019Few Corporate Defaults In 2018, But Pockets Of Distress Have Since Emerged, July 23, 2019
- U.S. Corporate Defaults Have Spiked This Year, July 18, 2019
- For The U.S. Expansion, Are Trade Troubles "Just A Flesh Wound"? June 25, 2019
- U.S. Biweekly Economic Roundup: The Fed Loses "Patience", June 22, 2019
- With Some Lingering Risks, The U.S. Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate Is Set To Rise To 2.7% By March 2020, June 3, 2019
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Credit Markets Research:||Nicole Serino, Primary Credit Analyst, New York + 1 (212) 438 1396;|
|Sudeep K Kesh, Secondary Credit Analyst, New York (1) 212-438-7982;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.