立即注册,

不到 60 秒您即可继续访问:最新资讯提要分析主题和专题大宗商品视频、播客和博客样本市场价格和数据专题报道订阅用户通知和每日大宗商品电子邮件提醒

已有帐户?

登录以注册

忘记密码

请注意:Platts Market Center 订阅用户只能通过 Platts Market Center 重置密码

请在下面输入您的电子邮件 ID,我们将给您发送一封包含您密码的电子邮件。


  • 电子邮件地址* 请输入电子邮件地址。

如果您是高级订阅用户,出于安全原因,我们无法向您发送您的密码。请联系客服团队

如果您是 Platts Market Center 订阅用户,若要重置密码,请转到 Platts Market Center 重置您的密码。

在此列表中
天然气 | 石油

Colorado voters reject oil, gas drilling setback rule 58-42

天然气 | 石油

Platts 情景规划服务

Bunker Fuel | 石油 | 原油 | 液化石油气 (LPG) | 石油风险 | 成品油 | 燃料油 | 汽油 | 航油 | 石脑油

appec

电力 | 天然气 | 石油 | 原油

伊拉克电力短缺叠加欧佩克+减产,促使巴格达向伊朗靠拢

Colorado voters reject oil, gas drilling setback rule 58-42

Denver — Colorado voters overwhelmingly rejected a measure which would have required drilling of oil and gas wells to be at least 2,500 feet away from occupied structures and vulnerable areas, such as parks and waterways, instead of 500 feet, after the local oil and gas industry poured more than $30 million into defeating the measure.

尚未注册?

接收每日电子邮件提醒、订阅用户通知并获得个性化体验。

立即注册

The measure was losing 57.7% to 43.3% as of Tuesday night, according to the Colorado Secretary of State's Office. It needed 50% or more to pass. If the proposition had passed, it would have crushed oil and gas production on state land, according to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

Colorado's drilling setback proposal would have banned most new drilling in the prolific Denver-Julesburg Basin, located just north of Denver. Surface area available for drilling would plummet by 78% in Weld County, the core of the DJ Basin, and 85% on all state-owned lands, according to the COGCC.

Oil and gas industry supporters were worried that the setbacks would have crippled an industry that employs nearly 30,000 people directly and contributes $31.4 billion to the state's economy each year.

"We're grateful that Coloradans stood with the energy sector to oppose this measure. I want every Coloradan to know that we are committed to developing our resources in a responsible manner that protects the environment and keeps our employees and communities healthy and safe," said Dan Haley, CEO of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association.

In preparing for the worst, several producers applied for as many drilling permits in advance of the election as possible, as the permits would be grandfathered in and have a shelf life of two years. The oil and gas industry invested about $36 million into defeating the proposition. In comparison, the opposition group, Colorado Rising, spent less than $1 million in promoting Proposition 112.

If the proposition had passed, the state's oil production would sink to 275,000 b/d by end-2023, a 54% decline from current projections, and natural gas output would fall to 1.9 Bcf/d, down 45% from the current outlook, S&P Global Platts Analytics estimated.

"We appreciate our fellow Coloradans' support for responsible energy development," said Chip Rimer, senior vice president of global services at Noble Energy, one of the top Colorado producers. "This measure was an extreme proposal that would have had devastating impacts across the state on jobs, education and numerous other programs important to each of us. Moving forward we will continue working together with all stakeholders to develop solutions that ensure we can continue to deliver the energy we need, the economy we want and the environment we value."

The victory for the industry occurred despite an extremely high output by Democratic voters, which resulted in Democrats winning most major statewide elections, including governor, secretary of state, state treasurer and attorney general.

However, Proposition 112 was denounced by the current Democratic Governor John Hickenlooper, as well as by both gubernatorial candidates, including Tuesday night's winner Democrat Jared Polis.

"Out-of-state interest underestimated Colorado voters," said Tracee Bentley, executive director of the Colorado Petroleum Council, a local division of the America Petroleum Institute. "The voters understood this was a hit to Colorado's economy." -- Brandon Evans, bevans@spglobal.com

-- Edited by Geetha Narayanasamy, newsdesk@spglobal.com