立即注册,

不到 60 秒您即可继续访问:最新资讯提要分析主题和专题大宗商品视频、播客和博客样本市场价格和数据专题报道订阅用户通知和每日大宗商品电子邮件提醒

已有帐户?

登录以注册

忘记密码

请注意:Platts Market Center 订阅用户只能通过 Platts Market Center 重置密码

请在下面输入您的电子邮件 ID,我们将给您发送一封包含您密码的电子邮件。


  • 电子邮件地址* 请输入电子邮件地址。

如果您是高级订阅用户,出于安全原因,我们无法向您发送您的密码。请联系客服团队

如果您是 Platts Market Center 订阅用户,若要重置密码,请转到 Platts Market Center 重置您的密码。

在此列表中
天然气

US gas bridge to renewables must be 'short' to meet climate goals: think tank

天然气 | 石油

Platts 情景规划服务

大宗商品 | 生物燃料 | 天然气 | 石油 | 石化产品

Foro de tendencias y precios de commodities Ciudad de México

金属 | 有色金属

到2025年,俄罗斯拟供应全球3.5%的锂

US gas bridge to renewables must be 'short' to meet climate goals: think tank

US natural gas use needs to peak within 17 years in order to meet the Obama administration's climate goals and prevent the worst impacts of global warming, a liberal think tank said in a report released Friday.

尚未注册?

接收每日电子邮件提醒、订阅用户通知并获得个性化体验。

立即注册

"It is clear that a long-term heavy reliance on natural gas beyond 2030 is incompatible with the emissions reductions necessary to stave off the worst impacts of climate change," the Center for American Progress said. "To be compatible with a stable climate, therefore, the natural-gas bridge must be extremely short."

The report, which presents a dire environmental case against the expansion of US gas use, claims that increased investments in gas-fired power plants and pipelines could "crowd out" investments in renewable energy sources including wind, solar and wave power.


In fact, in order to protect public health and the environment, the report recommends preventing US gas infrastructure and capacity from being "overbuilt," and keeping gas' share of the total energy supply below 40% in order to achieve goals to combat climate change. The report suggests limits on natural gas exports which could trigger increased demand and cause infrastructure to be overbuilt, making that transition to renewable fuels more difficult.

While gas is necessary to drive dirtier-burning coal from the US market, its expansion "needs to be managed safely and sustainably and without overbuilding long-term electricity-generation capacity that would then need to be retired," the report states.

The US "must stop short of initiating a major new wave of investments in natural-gas turbines, which would be expensive and politically painful to power down later," the report states.

The report, authored by Darryl Banks, CAP's vice president for energy policy, and Gwynne Taraska, a CAP research associate and research director at George Mason University, makes a number of recommendations that may not be welcome to industry to hurry the pace to a lower carbon energy mix. These include wellhead taxes, increased royalties and fees for extraction on public lands and waters and liquefaction fees at export terminals, which they said would help fund investments in efficiency, clean energy and offsets for damage from climate change.

The report claims that while gas is aiding a push away from high-carbon fossil fuels, it creates a host of environmental problems, particularly methane emissions.

The Obama administration has a goal of reducing emissions from 2005 levels by 42% by 2030, and then by 80% in 2050 for climate stabilization.

According to the report, a 42% drop is equivalent to just over 3.334 gigatons of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fossil fuels. In 2011, combustion from coal, oil and natural gas resulted in over 5.277 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions, according to Environmental Protection Agency data.

The report claims that if emissions from coal drop by 50% and oil emissions decline 30%, largely because of new fuel-economy standards, increased coal-to-gas switching and aggressive power plant regulations, total fossil-fuel related emissions would still be just over 3.716 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions, about 382 million mt over the 2030 goal.

"The use of natural gas therefore cannot expand unchecked," the report states. "Even minor increases in the near term mean that we will need to aggressively drive coal and oil from the US fuel mix."

--Brian Scheid, brian.scheid@platts.com
--Edited by Carla Bass, carla.bass@platts.com