立即注册,

不到 60 秒您即可继续访问:最新资讯提要分析主题和专题大宗商品视频、播客和博客样本市场价格和数据专题报道订阅用户通知和每日大宗商品电子邮件提醒

已有帐户?

登录以注册

忘记密码

请注意:Platts Market Center 订阅用户只能通过 Platts Market Center 重置密码

请在下面输入您的电子邮件 ID,我们将给您发送一封包含您密码的电子邮件。


  • 电子邮件地址* 请输入电子邮件地址。

如果您是高级订阅用户,出于安全原因,我们无法向您发送您的密码。请联系客服团队

如果您是 Platts Market Center 订阅用户,若要重置密码,请转到 Platts Market Center 重置您的密码。

在此列表中
煤炭 | 电力 | 天然气

Global energy demand could decline 6% in 2020 due to pandemic: IEA

煤炭

Platts Global Coal Alert

Bunker Fuel | 石油 | 原油 | 液化石油气 (LPG) | 石油风险 | 成品油 | 燃料油 | 汽油 | 航油 | 石脑油

appec

电力 | 天然气 | 石油 | 原油

伊拉克电力短缺叠加欧佩克+减产,促使巴格达向伊朗靠拢

Global energy demand could decline 6% in 2020 due to pandemic: IEA

亮点

Global power demand could fall 5%

Platts Analytics sees less severe impact

New York — Global energy demand is set to fall by 6% in 2020, the largest in 70 years, due to the coronavirus pandemic, an expert with the International Energy Agency said June 24, though S&P Global Platts Analytics expects a more moderate impact.

尚未注册?

接收每日电子邮件提醒、订阅用户通知并获得个性化体验。

立即注册

There could be a 6% reduction in total global energy demand in 2020 compared to 2019 as a result of coronavirus-related lockdowns, Peter Fraser, head of gas, coal and power markets at IEA, said during a webcast seminar hosted by IEA and non-profit Electric Power Research Institute.

But not every fuel is going to be affected in the same way, Fraser said, with fossil fuels impacted more than non-fossil fuels.

The international energy market watchdog estimates there will be a significant decline in coal demand because of impacts on developing economies and relatively low natural gas prices in more advanced economies, Fraser said.

"The combination of those two factors are really hitting coal very hard," he said.

In the case of natural gas, the impact will be somewhat more modest, with global demand for the fuel falling 4% in 2020 followed by a rebound in 2021 where it makes up all the lost ground, Fraser said.

This is because gas is taking away business from coal in the power sector amid low prices, he said.

The agency expects an 8% reduction in 2020 oil demand year-over-year, but a small reduction in nuclear demand, while renewables remain relatively unaffected.

In terms of global power demand, the IEA is seeing a 5% reduction in 2020, which would be the largest since the US Great Depression in the 1930s, Fraser said, adding the US is largely in line with that estimate.

However, Platts Analytics estimates the US will see a more moderate power demand impact from the pandemic in 2020.

"US [Lower-48] loads have recovered and are close to the loads we would expect with current weather in the absence of the pandemic," Manan Ahuja, manager of North American power analytics and modelling, said in an email.

Even with the mild winter, we had at start of the year, overall 2020 loads in the US will likely end up being about 2% lower year-over-year, Ahuja said, adding that assumes we have a normal summer and large-scale lockdowns do not happen again from a second wave of the coronavirus pandemic.

Platts Analytics expects power demand will shrink by 1.2% on the year in 2020 across the major markets globally, also assuming normal weather and no significant second waves of infections, Bruno Brunetti, head of global power planning, said in an email.

Emissions, other impacts

Fraser said the IEA expects global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions to fall nearly 8% in 2020, the lowest level in a decade with reduced coal use contributing most, but experience suggests that a large rebound is likely post crisis.

Other experts on the panel agreed.

Tom Wilson, principal technical executive at EPRI, pointed out that world wars and earlier pandemics have not stopped greenhouse gas emissions growth.

He asked, how many people have destroyed their cars because they have been using them less frequently?

"Human suffering and economic collapse are not the way to reduce emissions," Wilson said.

He has been researching broad societal themes and lasting impacts from the pandemic over the past few months and said the over-riding theme is the lasting impacts are likely things that already existed, but may be accelerated due to the pandemic.

Examples include digitalization, the demise of brick and mortar retail and rising nationalism. Slowing trends include urbanization, shared economy and travel, Wilson said.

One interesting behavioral change is increased working from home. Companies have been surprised at how effectively it is working, he said, with many finding themselves more nimble.

However, it is less clear how working from home more might impact GHG emissions levels.

"It's not a slam dunk that less commuting will reduce emissions," Wilson said.

With regard to the financial sector, Morgan Scott, principal project manager for sustainability at EPRI, said her group has seen extensive growth in money flowing into ESG funds.

EPRI is not sure exactly why there has been significant growth in those funds during a time of economic downturn, but something is happening around ESG performance, Scott said.