立即注册,

不到 60 秒您即可继续访问:最新资讯提要分析主题和专题大宗商品视频、播客和博客样本市场价格和数据专题报道订阅用户通知和每日大宗商品电子邮件提醒

已有帐户?

登录以注册

忘记密码

请注意:Platts Market Center 订阅用户只能通过 Platts Market Center 重置密码

请在下面输入您的电子邮件 ID,我们将给您发送一封包含您密码的电子邮件。


  • 电子邮件地址* 请输入电子邮件地址。

如果您是高级订阅用户,出于安全原因,我们无法向您发送您的密码。请联系客服团队

如果您是 Platts Market Center 订阅用户,若要重置密码,请转到 Platts Market Center 重置您的密码。

在此列表中
煤炭 | 电力

Coal being pushed out of power market, PacifiCorp study acknowledges

煤炭

Platts Global Coal Alert

Bunker Fuel | 石油 | 原油 | 液化石油气 (LPG) | 石油风险 | 成品油 | 燃料油 | 汽油 | 航油 | 石脑油

appec

液化天然气 (LNG) | 天然气 | 石油 | 原油 | 石化产品

访谈:IOC董事长表示,可能会对长协原油使用选择性条款,推迟LNG进口

Coal being pushed out of power market, PacifiCorp study acknowledges

亮点

Emissions reductions counted heavily in benefits

Higher renewables could create uncerntainty

After months of environmental groups' claims that PacifiCorp was hiding the true economic picture of its coal-fired generation, the company presented an updated analysis showing that its customers could save money if four units at the Naughton and Jim Bridger plants in Wyoming are retired early, the utility said in a Thursday public presentation.

尚未注册?

接收每日电子邮件提醒、订阅用户通知并获得个性化体验。

立即注册

The Berkshire Hathaway Energy subsidiary did not conclude what the least-cost way to retire those units and other coal facilities would be, because the utility must complete additional resource portfolio studies before submitting its final 2019 Integrated Resource Plan to regulators in the states it serves by August 1. The analysis also considered the possible retirement of five more units at three other coal plants, indicating lower potential savings for those.

Western Resource Advocates, an environmental group, said coal plants are becoming increasingly uneconomic as the price of power from renewable sources continues to fall. "Customers in all Western states will be best served by PacifiCorp replacing aging coal units with renewable energy resources that are cost-effective and reduce harmful carbon emissions that drive climate change," the organization's attorney Sophie Hayes said in a statement.

The PacifiCorp study shows Naughton units 1 and 2 and Jim Bridger units 1 and 2, in which the utility is a majority owner and operator of both plants, are candidates for early retirement because they are less economic than other resources to operate beyond 2022.

COMMUNITY IMPACT

Yet, the company said it is mindful of the impact on communities and employees that would result from closing those units.

"The timing and sequencing of any actual coal unit closures will ultimately be determined by a range of factors that also include workforce and community transition considerations," PacifiCorp said in a press release.

The utility's next steps will include evaluation of alternative operational scenarios, such as assessing state rules for acquiring new resources and needs for transmission upgrades.

The utility also pointed to natural gas pipeline delivery risk in considering gas-fired resources for replacing coal. Variable energy resources, primarily wind and solar, were modeled with fixed hourly generation profiles, but the intermittency of renewable generation adds uncertainty, PacifiCorp said.

Carbon dioxide emissions reductions counted heavily in the overall benefits associated with accelerated retirements. PacifiCorp also ran models on retiring Dave Johnston unit 3 in Wyoming, Craig (Yampa) units 1 and 2 in Colorado and Hayden units 1 and 2 in Colorado.

The analysis did not take into account the health benefits due to cleaner air and water that would result from replacing coal with renewable energy and battery storage, said Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign Representative Christopher Thomas. The organization fought for the public release of the coal plant economics information.

"This just adds to all the numbers we're seeing across the country that show clean energy is a far better deal than coal, and PacifiCorp's analysis doesn't even account for the benefits to our environment and public health from burning less coal," Thomas said. "PacifiCorp finally seems to be coming to grips with the fact that coal just doesn't make economic sense anymore."

-- Jeff Stanfield, S&P Global Market Intelligence, newsdesk@spglobal.com

-- Edited by Gail Roberts, newsdesk@spglobal.com