立即注册,

不到 60 秒您即可继续访问:最新资讯提要分析主题和专题大宗商品视频、播客和博客样本市场价格和数据专题报道订阅用户通知和每日大宗商品电子邮件提醒

已有帐户?

登录以注册

忘记密码

请注意:Platts Market Center 订阅用户只能通过 Platts Market Center 重置密码

请在下面输入您的电子邮件 ID,我们将给您发送一封包含您密码的电子邮件。


  • 电子邮件地址* 请输入电子邮件地址。

如果您是高级订阅用户,出于安全原因,我们无法向您发送您的密码。请联系客服团队

如果您是 Platts Market Center 订阅用户,若要重置密码,请转到 Platts Market Center 重置您的密码。

在此列表中
煤炭

Nearly 17% of US coal production uneconomic in today's market: analyst

煤炭

Platts Global Coal Alert

Bunker Fuel | 石油 | 原油 | 液化石油气 (LPG) | 石油风险 | 成品油 | 燃料油 | 汽油 | 航油 | 石脑油

appec

煤炭 | 电力 | 可再生能源 | 液化天然气 (LNG) | 天然气

分析:随着行业重新调整,亚洲未来的LNG进口项目将被搁置

Nearly 17% of US coal production uneconomic in today's market: analyst

亮点

Daily pricing for tons and allowances for SO2 and NOx emissions

The exclusive Platts OTC Broker Index, a market assessment compiled from three of the largest and most respected coal brokers

What happened in yesterday's OTC markets, and why

An analysis of coal price trends in all major U.S. producing areas

Details of how major coal companies are trading in the financial markets

Coverage of mine openings, closings, production

Reports on who's in the market for coal

Houston — Close to 17% of US coal production forecast for this year, a total of 162 million st, is "unprofitable" in today's market, increasing the risk of more mines being idled or closed, analysts at Wood Mackenzie said Monday.

尚未注册?

接收每日电子邮件提醒、订阅用户通知并获得个性化体验。

立即注册

Altogether, about 14% of US thermal coal production and 58% of metallurgical coal production is at risk because of pricing in today's market.

The region most at risk, according to Wood Mackenzie's latest coal market outlook, is Central Appalachia, where about 72% of the total coal output is unprofitable. Years of declining productivity, thinning seams, increasing strip ratios, more stringent government regulations and a high-paid workforce have made Central Appalachia the highest-cost region in the US.

Wood Mackenzie said the price to produce CAPP coal is about $65/st, compared with $47.50/st for Northern Appalachia and $34/st for the Illinois Basin.


At today's prices, 13% of NAPP coal is unprofitable, analysts said, compared with 8% for both Western Bituminous and Powder River Basin.

Even though many producers are losing money on the coal they sell, there are many reasons why more US mines are not being idled or shut altogether, Wood Mackenzie said.

One reason producers may keep running a mine losing money is because it could be an asset for sale, said Dale Hazelton, senior research analyst at Wood Mackenzie. An operating mine is more attractive to buyers, he said.

"In general, if you've got the money to buy a coal asset, this is the time to do it," he said. "They're at the bottom of the market. As long as you're doing your due diligence, it could be a good time for the right company to take on assets like mines."

Murray Energy certainly has been in the market to acquire such assets, making the biggest moves recently in the US. Murray announced during the weekend it will spend about $1.4 billion for controlling interest in Foresight Energy, and in 2013 Murray bought five underground thermal coal mines in West Virginia from Consol Energy for $3.25 billion.

Hazelton said another reason mines losing money would still be operating is if a producer is able to beat market prices with a niche-quality coal, or the location of the mine is near an end-user, providing a transportation advantage over competitors.

Long-term contracts are also keeping mines running, Hazelton said. While many producers are losing on every short ton sold for prompt delivery, the amount and size of those deals on the open market is very small compared with coal already sold under long-term contracts at a price above the current market.

Hazelton said it probably is not a coincidence that some long-term contracts with utility companies are coming to an end as federal emissions regulations, particularly the US Environmental Protection Agency's Mercury and Air Toxics rule, are coming into effect. With uncertainty in the market, the prices and lengths of future long-term contracts are up for speculation.

"I don't expect you'll see too many producers who will want to lock in a five-year contract at the current rates," he said. "Now, given the right price, you could see that. But both sides in a deal will have to move the number, but you're not going to see 1 million-ton contracts at these rates."

--Jim Levesque, jim.levesque@platts.com
--Edited by Annie Siebert, ann.siebert@platts.com