Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

Please Note: Platts Market Center subscribers can only reset passwords via the Platts Market Center

Enter your Email ID below and we will send you an email with your password.

  • Email Address* Please enter email address.

If you are a premium subscriber, we are unable to send you your password for security reasons. Please contact the Client Services team.

If you are a Platts Market Center subscriber, to reset your password go to the Platts Market Center to reset your password.

In this list

Interview: 0.5% and 3.5%-S bunkers spread could reach $400/mt in 2020 - consultant

Commodities | Petrochemicals | Aromatics | Olefins | Polymers | Solvents & Intermediates | Shipping | Marine Fuels

A sea of challenges: The impact of IMO 2020 on petrochemicals


Platts Dirty Tankerwire

Oil | Refined Products | Fuel Oil | Shipping | Dry Freight | Marine Fuels | Tankers

Mediterranean Bunker Fuel Conference, 8th Annual

Natural Gas


Interview: 0.5% and 3.5%-S bunkers spread could reach $400/mt in 2020 - consultant

Singapore — The spread between the price of bunker fuel with maximum 0.5% sulfur and 3.5% sulfur could reach as high as $400/mt in 2020 as refineries will lose an annual market of over 200 million mt of heavy fuel oil due to the International Maritime Organization's global sulfur limit rule for marine fuels, an industry consultant said Wednesday.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

"As they [refiners] cannot stockpile HFO they will need to find other markets. If HFO has to compete with coal, for example in power stations, the HFO price will fall dramatically as the coal price is about half of the HFO price," Niels Bjorn Lindberg Mortensen told S&P Global Platts in an interview.

HFO is a generic term for fuels used to generate motion and/or fuels to generate heat that have a particularly high viscosity and density.

Another possible scenario is that the excess HFO will be shipped to new or upgraded refineries for de-sulphurization or for further cracking in cokers or hydrocrackers, said Mortensen, who is a maritime industry veteran.

Eventually all the hydrocarbon molecules will be consumed one way or the other and the refiners will undoubtedly find ways to produce compliant 0.50%-sulfur fuel which will be cheaper than clean distillate fuels like MDO and MGO, he said.

"So even if the price gap between MDO/MGO and HFO may remain relatively high, alternative (or hybrid, as some call them) compliant fuels will, pricewise, be somewhere in between. Over time the price could be closer to HFO than to distillate," he said.

The MARPOL Annex VI, which deals with maritime safety and security, as well as the prevention of marine pollution from ships, applies to ships with gross tonnage of over 400. There are around 60,000 of them, but only some 35,000-40,000 are able to burn HFO, Mortensen said.

Of these, over 1,600 ships are confirmed to have scrubbers installed by 2020, a figure which might rise to 2,000 Mortensen said. The remaining 95% of these ships should be operated on compliant fuel, he added.

Around 1%-2% will use LNG, LPG, methanol or alternative fuels in 2020, Mortensen added.

"I presume the exhaust gas cleaning systems ordering curve will flatten out shortly after 2020, and that it will mainly be for newbuilds from around 2023," Mortensen said.

EGCS, popularly known as scrubbers, are systems used to collect excess sulfur while burning marine fuels.

"In 2025 I'd estimate that some 10%-15% of the relevant fleet will have scrubbers," Mortensen said, adding that tankers seem to be a segment in which scrubbers will be quite commonly installed.


According to Mortensen, compliance rate within the North European Sulfur Emission Control Area, or SECA, has been around 95% since 2015. He thus estimates that global compliance is likely to be around 90% in 2020.

This would ramp up as global Port State Control cooperation improves over time, he said.

New requirements, such as the fuel ban to be imposed on March 1, 2020 as well as the EU MRV and the IMO Data Collection System, will make systematic non-compliance increasingly difficult, he said.

A few might continue trading non-compliant fuel for a while, but it will probably only be possible outside areas where fuel inspections are already an established practice, he said.

A large number of port states have not yet ratified MARPOL Annex VI, and bunker suppliers in those countries can sell any fuel they have access to, Mortensen said.

So the potential for cheating will be present and with the huge money at stake some will most likely be tempted, he said.

"Whether such cheating will be instigated from the top management of the company, will depend on the nature, size and structure of the company. However, cheating instigated by the ships' crew may take place everywhere," he said.

"The former will seriously skew the level playing field, the latter will not disturb competition," he said.

It will not be possible to establish a global compliance rate until enforcement regimes are commonly applied globally, and even then there will still be both flag and port states which are not parties to MARPOL Annex VI, and therefore not able to enforce the rules, Mortensen added.

-- Surabhi Sahu,

-- Edited by Norazlina Jumaat,