Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

Please Note: Platts Market Center subscribers can only reset passwords via the Platts Market Center

Enter your Email ID below and we will send you an email with your password.

  • Email Address* Please enter email address.

If you are a premium subscriber, we are unable to send you your password for security reasons. Please contact the Client Services team.

If you are a Platts Market Center subscriber, to reset your password go to the Platts Market Center to reset your password.

In this list
Natural Gas

Latest approval for exporting US LNG a disappointment: Freeport CEO

LNG | Natural Gas | Natural Gas (North American)

2020: The shakeout year to come for US LNG development

LNG | Natural Gas | NGL

Platts LNG Alert

Capital Markets | Commodities | Electricity | Energy | LNG | Natural Gas | Shipping | Leveraged Finance & High Yield | Materials | Building & Construction | Financial Services | Banking | Infrastructure | Structured Finance

Infrastructure Summit

LNG | Natural Gas | Natural Gas (North American)

FERC signs off on four proposed US LNG export projects

Latest approval for exporting US LNG a disappointment: Freeport CEO


The US Department of Energy's latest conditional approval allowing Freeport LNG to ship more liquefied natural gas from its proposed Texas terminal falls 1 Bcf/d short of the Houston-based company's export plans, creating excess capacity and potentially complicating future expansion, the company's CEO said Monday.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

"We're quite disappointed in the order itself," Freeport CEO Michael Smith said in an interview.

On Friday, DOE gave conditional approval for Freeport LNG to export an additional 400,000 Mcf/d from its planned Quintana Island facility to countries that do not have free trade agreements with the US.

The order, just the fifth of its kind DOE has granted, was the second Freeport had received. In May, the agency gave Freeport conditional approval to export up to 1.4 Bcf/d of LNG to non-FTA countries.

But the order Friday was 1 Bcf/d short of the export level Freeport wanted, a reduction that DOE did not explain and seems to have no rationale for, Smith said.

"They're basically making the rules up as they go along," Smith said. "We're spending $4 billion per train, if you can get an extra five or ten or 15% out of the train you should be able to sell it after making that kind of capital commitment."

Freeport plans to export LNG from three trains, with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval expected in early spring and its first cargoes shipped by early 2018. It is also considering a fourth train, Smith said. It plans to ship LNG from the first train to Japan's Osaka Gas and Chubu Electric Power, LNG from the second train to BP Energy and gas from the third train to Toshiba and SK E&S, a South Korean utility.

Smith said the extra capacity not approved for export under the DOE's orders will likely be shipped to SK E&S since DOE cannot put restrictions on LNG exports to countries such as South Korea, which have a free trade agreement with the US.

"If I did not have a free trade company as one of my five customers, [DOE's export restrictions] would be retarding the amount of gas I could be selling to foreign countries," Smith said.

By law, DOE has to quickly approve an application to ship LNG to FTA countries, but can restrict or modify applications to ship to non-FTA countries, such as Japan or China.

Following Friday's Freeport announcement, there are at least 20 non-FTA export applications in line waiting for DOE approval, but Smith said that likely only one more, Sempra LNG's application to ship 1.7 Bcf/d from its Cameron LNG facility in Louisiana, will likely be approved before the DOE imposes a moratorium on new approvals. DOE will likely wait to study new, year-end data before its next approval.

The delay will likely have little impact, Smith said.

"The bottom line is that the new data is going to be better than the old data the way the reserves are growing, so I think that's not a valid point for slowing things up," he said.

--Brian Scheid,
--Edited by Keiron Greenhalgh,