BY CONTINUING TO USE THIS SITE, YOU ARE AGREEING TO OUR USE OF COOKIES. REVIEW OUR
COOKIE NOTICE

Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

Please Note: Platts Market Center subscribers can only reset passwords via the Platts Market Center

Enter your Email ID below and we will send you an email with your password.


  • Email Address* Please enter email address.

If you are a premium subscriber, we are unable to send you your password for security reasons. Please contact the Client Services team.

If you are a Platts Market Center subscriber, to reset your password go to the Platts Market Center to reset your password.

In this list
Coal

Coal generation falls more than most US utilities had forecast: RETAC survey

Coal | Emissions | Electric Power | Emissions | Renewables | Natural Gas | LNG

CERAWeek refelctions: Fuel diversity in focus for an energy-hungry world

Coal

Platts Global Coal Alert

Renewables | Natural Gas | Fuel Oil | Utilities

Central American Energy Conference, 22nd Annual

Coal

Total US coal traffic totals 72,190, down 16% on year; drop led by PRB railroads: AAR

Coal generation falls more than most US utilities had forecast: RETAC survey

Highlights

Daily pricing for tons and allowances for SO2 and NOx emissions

The exclusive Platts OTC Broker Index, a market assessment compiled from three of the largest and most respected coal brokers

What happened in yesterday's OTC markets, and why

An analysis of coal price trends in all major U.S. producing areas

Details of how major coal companies are trading in the financial markets

Coverage of mine openings, closings, production

Reports on who's in the market for coal

Washington — Utilities are burning less coal than they previously expected, a survey the US Surface Transportation Board conducted shows.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

During a Rail Energy Transportation Advisory Committee hearing Tuesday in Washington, committee member John Carr, the vice president of strategic planning at Dairyland Power Cooperative, presented results of a utilities survey conducted in September with the National Coal Transportation Association.

In it, 71% of surveyed utilities said their coal-fired generation was below forecasted totals. Another 29% of utilities said coal-fired generation was similar to forecasts, while none said their coal-fired generation was above forecasts.

Dennis Rackers, another committee member and director of fuels and materials management at Northern Indiana Public Service, said his utility is expecting a 25% decline in coal consumption this year, with volumes decreasing to 5.1 million st from 6.8 million st. He noted coal consumption would have dropped even more if the Midcontinent Independent System Operator did not dispatch some coal units as "must-run" to test emission controls.



Increased natural gas generation is the main driver for the coal-burn reduction, Carr said, noting that coal is playing less of a "baseload role" for utilities and serving more in an "intermediate dispatch role."

A majority, or 65% of utilities said coal generation was lower than a year ago, with 29% reporting similar coal generation as last year and 6% reporting more.

Less burn has increased coal stockpiles, with 65% of utilities reporting stocks above 2014 levels, 24% reporting similar inventories and only 12% reporting smaller coal stocks.

As of September, 18% of utilities said they had coal stockpiles of more than 70 days of burn and 35% said they had 50-70 days of burn.

The decline in coal burn has made ratable, or consistent, rail delivery "a challenge [for utilities] in this environment," Carr added. "We see the need for a flexible delivery system that can rapidly respond to dynamic demand for coal in gas versus coal economics. This means up or down."

Committee members noted power plants have a limit on how much coal can be stored on-site, with some facilities facing fines if inventories exceed permitted levels.

Rob Hardman, the co-chairman elect of the committee and vice president of coal supply at Dynegy, said the years of steady thermal coal demand have now passed because of other options for utilities including "wind, solar or natural gas that really challenges the underpinning design of the entire supply chain that was put together years ago."

Committee member Donna Cerwonka, assistant vice president of southern utility coal for CSX, said railroads work with utility customers on coal delivery options, but there's only so much the railroads can do.

"This challenge is not just one individual customer," Cerwonka said. "Typically, when one customer is looking to increase their shipments, everybody is because it's a response to market conditions."

--Jim Levesque, jim.levesque@platts.com
--Edited by Valarie Jackson, valarie.jackson@platts.com