trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/XHi3H7FHavs7FqLh8XKbig2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In This List

Spain's Supreme Court says floor clause claims still valid after loan ends

Key Credit Risk Factors When Assessing Banks In The Context Of COVID-19

Street Talk Episode 61 - Investors debate if U.S. banks have enough capital in post COVID world

You Down With PPP? Consider The Risks

Street Talk Episode 60 - You Down With PPP? Consider The Risks


Spain's Supreme Court says floor clause claims still valid after loan ends

Spain's Supreme Court has ruled that borrowers can still make claims against abusive interest rate caps on mortgages even if they have sold their property, Expansión reported Dec. 18.

The court was responding to a claim by borrowers who had sold their property while they were attempting to be reimbursed for having paid too much because of so-called mortgage floors, the paper said. Their bank had informed them that it was closing the claim a few weeks after the property was sold, the report said.

The borrowers took legal action against the lender, and the Supreme Court has declared previous legal rulings void and requested a new ruling, Expansión said.

Spain's controversial mortgage floors capped the interest rate on floating-rate mortgages, meaning some borrowers were unable to benefit from the fall in interest rates, but the European Court of Justice ruled in 2016 that the contracts were abusive and banks would have to reimburse borrowers for paying too much.