trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/V6d0mgbLvHB2nwru8BnRBQ2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In this list

US trade judge recommends import ban on some Apple iPhones

After Growing In 2019, Latam FTTP Market Might Slowdown In 2020 Due To COVID-19

COVID-19 Crisis: Legacy TV Universe Strategic Analysis

Another Outcome Of COVID-19: Olympics Postponed

OTT Winners, Losers In The Age Of COVID-19

US trade judge recommends import ban on some Apple iPhones

The long-running legal battle between Apple Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. moved forward March 26 with a pair of rulings from the U.S. International Trade Commission.

In one case, a judge ruled that Apple infringed on a Qualcomm patent with its iPhones and recommended that some older iPhone models containing chips made by Intel Corp. should be blocked from the U.S., Bloomberg News reported March 26.

The judge's recommendation is subject to review by the full commission and will not result in a ban unless the full ITC agrees, according to the report.

In a separate case, however, the ITC on March 26 said Qualcomm should not have been granted a patent for a battery saving feature, thus invalidating the patent.

The legal battle between the two companies stretches back two years. Apple in January 2017 filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm for overcharging on licensing fees. In July 2017, Qualcomm responded with a lawsuit against Apple, alleging patent infringement. At the same time, the FTC has charged Qualcomm with monopolistic behavior and overcharging on licensing fees. Arguments in the FTC case ended Jan. 29, and both sides are awaiting the judge's decision. More recently, a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of California recently ruled that Qualcomm must pay back almost $1 billion of patent royalty rebates to Apple.