trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/P44IQSEO6NSclwdIlXR_uQ2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In This List

US judge blocks Interior Department from using royalty committee advice


S&P podcast - Coronavirus pandemic, oil price crash shake up energy sector

Case Study: A Utility Company Efficiently Sharpens Its Focus on the Credit Risk of New Customers

Mining Exploration Insights December

US judge blocks Interior Department from using royalty committee advice

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy blocked the Department of the Interior from relying on advice from a royalty committee that it formed to advise on energy and mineral resource leasing policies on public lands.

The Interior Department is reviewing the decision, a spokesperson said in an email.

The controversial Royalty Policy Committee, struck under former Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke, made recommendations on various matters, including royalty policies, and has since been disbanded.

In an Aug. 13 ruling, Molloy said the "establishment and operation of the royalty committee presents a concerning case study in the regulation of advisory committees and their role in government."

He said the Western Organization of Resource Councils, which filed the case along with Democracy Forward, "identified a gaping hole in government accountability."

The Western Organization of Resource Councils argued that the committee was not fairly balanced, according to Molloy's judgment. Critics of the committee have charged that its membership was lopsided in favor of industry supporters.

"Federal law protects the public from this kind of corrupt policy making," Democracy Forward litigation director Javier Guzman said in a prepared statement.