trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/o1i5Rsv2viC43Ump1PLeTA2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In This List

MetLife to pay $10M penalty over accounting errors

2018 US Property Casualty Insurance Market Report

Fintech

Fintech Funding Flows To Insurtech In February

Lemonade Growing Premiums Faster Than Esurance's Homeowners Business Did

U.S. Life & Health Insurance Market Report


MetLife to pay $10M penalty over accounting errors

MetLife Inc. has agreed to pay $10 million to settle charges that it violated federal securities laws related to "longstanding accounting errors" caused by its insufficient internal controls.

The SEC said the company violated the books and records and internal accounting controls provisions of the federal securities laws due to improperly released reserves for annuity benefits associated with its retirement and income solutions business, which increased its income.

MetLife allegedly presumed annuitants had died or would never be found if they did not respond to two mailing attempts made approximately five and a half years apart. The company later determined that the practice, which it had been doing for more than 25 years, was insufficient to justify the release of reserves. The company corrected the error by increasing reserves by $510 million as of the end of 2017.

The SEC also found that MetLife overstated reserves and understated income related to variable annuity guarantees assumed by its subsidiary. The company corrected the error by reducing reserves by $896 million as of the end of 2017. The company said data mistakes, including its failure to properly incorporate policyholder withdrawals into its valuation model, had caused the error.

The company agreed to cease and desist from committing any future violations, but did not admit or deny the SEC's findings.