trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/9cLyNL4dTrCVow0mQuqHPw2 content esgSubNav
Log in to other products

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us
In This List

PSEG executive confident NJ nuke credits will be upheld

Blog

US utility commissioners: Who they are and how they impact regulation

Video

Climate Credit Analytics: Linking climate scenarios to financial impacts

Blog

Essential Energy Insights, April 2021

Blog

The Heightened Regulatory Environment: Is the Banking Sector Facing More Fines?


PSEG executive confident NJ nuke credits will be upheld

Leadership at New Jersey-headquartered investor-owned utility Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. said May 29 that a state regulatory decision to support the company's nuclear power plants is expected to survive appeal, while additional support also is likely from pending wholesale power market changes.

"We are very confident that our application met all the requirements of the zero-emissions credit act and that we provided all requirements for the [New Jersey] Board of Public Utilities to make their decisions," company Executive Vice President and General Counsel Tamara Linde said during the group's, or PSEG's, investor conference at the New York Stock Exchange.

Zero-emission credits, or ZECs, were awarded to subsidiary PSEG Power LLC's New Jersey nuclear plants — Hope Creek and the two-unit Salem facility — on April 18 to preserve the plants for their clean air attributes, according to Linde's presentation. Exelon Corp. through a subsidiary owns a roughly 43% interest in the Salem plant.

On that day, New Jersey's electric distribution companies began collecting a 0.4 cent/kWh fee from ratepayers to purchase ZECs at a cost of about $10/MWh until May 31, 2022, according to the company's presentation.

"We operate those plants with a return expectation that we don't disclose except to say that it should exceed the utility regulated rate of return," PSEG Chairman, President and CEO Ralph Izzo said in an interview at the conference. "And that's a 9.6% ROE."

The market and operational risks of running the plants cannot be ignored, Izzo added.

The last day to appeal the Board of Public Utilities' decision is June 3, and one appeal has already been filed by the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel.

Because of the confidential nature of the proceeding, "there have been misstatements," Linde said, pointing to arguments from opponents who filed comments suggesting the merchant plants should retire if they are not making enough money in the competitive wholesale power markets. The plants operate in the PJM Interconnection market.

However, Linde said, the current market is not designed to value the environmental or resilience attributes associated with the nuclear generation. Additionally, retiring the plants, which PSEG said it would do without ZECs, would have run counter to New Jersey's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals because natural gas would likely have been the replacement fuel, Linde said.

PSEG Power President and COO Ralph LaRossa had a slide, based on U.S. Energy Information Administration data, showing that when Exelon's Oyster Creek nuclear plant shut down in September 2018, there was almost one-for-one, on a terawatt-hour basis, replacement from nuclear to gas.

Market design changes

"We continue to try to influence the wholesale power markets to improve the energy market so they properly value the generation that's being relied upon through price reform activities," Linde said. And while the company is seeing "slow backlogged activity" on market issues at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, PSEG was pleased to see the recent fast start pricing decision, she added.

FERC in April ordered PJM and the New York ISO to change their rules so that fast-start resources can set prices, a move that could boost market prices when these resources are called on for reliability.

The passage of fast-start pricing did not appear to move the forward power price curve, Izzo said, and noted this could be because the changes have already been "baked in." It could also be because the forward market is not sure how the changes will impact prices or because the 18-month forward market is less liquid and it will take time for the changes to take effect, he said.

"Hopefully a more efficient market will help improve prices, but that is not a game changer for nuclear power," Izzo said. If power prices go up, New Jersey has to rethink ZECs, but PJM's power market reforms alone are probably not enough to provide a material market improvement without a price on carbon, he said.

There are other energy market rule changes pending before FERC and Linde called PJM's operating reserve demand curve filing a "good important step," but also noted uncertainty with the timing of PJM's upcoming August capacity market auction.

FERC has yet to rule on some major capacity market reforms filed by PJM, but the commission did say the existing rules are unjust and unreasonable, which has created uncertainty.

Jared Anderson is a reporter for S&P Global Platts. S&P Global Platts and S&P Global Market Intelligence are owned by S&P Global Inc.