Providing essential data requires that we go beyond the balance sheet. Our ESG solutions offer financially relevant analytics and timely data to assess risk, uncover opportunities and inform long term sustainable growth.Learn more about our ESG capabilities
From S&P Global’s Energy Transition Research Lab, this report provides our insights on the impact COVID-19 has had on the energy transition—at the critical time when policymakers and leading energy companies are showing increased commitments to net zero.
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most severe economic and energy shocks in modern history. On top of the massive disruptions to business, mobility, and everyday life, there clearly will be longer-lasting implications for the energy transition away from fossil fuels. While the shocks from the pandemic are leading to reductions in fossil fuel consumption and emissions, they will not be enough to put the world on a path to meet 2 degree global warming target, nor bring forward peak oil demand, nor drive coal consumption to near zero.
- The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn increased attention to climate policy and economic resilience.
- More than 10 times the emission reductions resulting from COVID-19 will be needed to meet the 2 degree target through 2050.
- Lower global energy demand threatens gas more than other fuel sources over the next 10-20 years.
- We believe the global growth outlook for renewables generally remains intact, but not all lights are green.
- COVID-19 has reduced long-term world oil demand by 2.5 million barrels per day.
Climate Week Event
On Tuesday, September 22, at 12:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, experts from across S&P Global discussed the transition to a low carbon economy—including the challenges ahead, what industries will be especially affected, and why the time to transition is now.
Roundtable Discussion Participants:
—Susan Gray, Global Head of Sustainable Finance, Business, and Innovation, S&P Global Ratings
—Manjit Jus, Managing Director, Global Head of ESG Research & Data, S&P Global
—Roman Kramarchuk, Head Energy Scenarios, Policy & Technology Analytics, S&P Global Platts
—Lauren Smart, Managing Director, Global Head of ESG Commercial at S&P Global Market Intelligence
—Reid Steadman, Managing Director and Global Head of ESG at S&P Dow Jones Indices
—Evan Greenfield, Senior Managing Director, Global Head of ESG at S&P Global (moderator)
S&P Global is proud to support Climate Week NYC 2020 to accelerate progress on climate risk, and provide the essential intelligence to achieve sustainability at scale.
The Approaching Horizon
Our vision of the coming climate disaster is limited by political, practical, and professional horizons—which limit foresight to, at best, a decade. The tragedy of this limited horizon is that our planning cycles are out of sync with the systemic risks of global climate change.
Investors focused on the carbon intensity of financial assets are necessarily aware of and preparing for transition risks, whereas investors focused on physical asset risk related to climate change are necessarily aware of and preparing for the possibility of inaction. To be clear, responsible investors must take both physical and transition risks into account, but the weighting of these two approaches will indicate the relative market force of optimism versus pessimism on climate.Read the Full Featured Article
China's energy policy is drifting. To dig the economy out of its COVID lows, planners are approving more infrastructure, and using more energy to drive the economy. China is also relying more on high-carbon fuel. S&P Global Ratings believes Beijing's success in returning to a less energy-intensive growth model has implications for its economy, financial resilience, and environment.
- China's transition to a low energy intensity economy fueled increasingly by renewables will stall in 2020 and 2021 as policy stimulus ripples through the economy.
- Investment in renewables continues but signs of a turn back to coal are emerging, a tendency that could strengthen as post-pandemic geopolitics push energy security up the policy agenda.
- We will only learn whether China is executing an energy U-turn after the next five-year plan for 2021-2025 is published in the first quarter next year.
This year may be remembered as a tipping point for the oil and gas industry. In the midst of a global pandemic and economic lockdown that are expected to wipe out over 8 million b/d of oil demand, producers have slashed capital spending to the lowest in 15 years.
Crude and condensate output is forecast to fall 7% year on year, dipping below 80 million b/d, and oil prices in late August remained around $20/b below 2019 average levels.
In almost any other year, these cuts to capital spending and output could be attributed to supply-demand cycles and price responsiveness.
- A company that pursues a full-scale transformation of its business model as part of its energy transition strategy would either face intense competition from incumbents or could develop a path dependency.
- Some oil producers and major lenders have announced that they will no longer seek to develop higher cost supplies such as Canadian oil sands or Russian Arctic offshore deposits.
Future of Fossil Fuels
A post-pandemic economic recovery would see global CO2 emissions return to 2018 levels by 2022, according to Platts Analytics Scenario Planning Service, whose data and forecasts are visualized here.
After 2022, growth in CO2 emissions essentially flattens to 0.2% a year before peaking in 2032. By 2040 emissions remain around 3 Gt above 2020 levels, as abatement efforts are offset by the continued use of coal for power generation in Asia's growth economies.
Interactive Infographic: Fossil Fuels' Shrinking Share of Global Energy Mix After 2020 Shock
Fossil fuels would shrink to roughly half of total primary energy supply in 2050, from about 77% in 2020, if the world meets the minimum Paris Agreement target of 2C warming, according to the latest projections by S&P Global Platts Analytics.
The demand shock caused by the coronavirus pandemic has slashed 2020 emissions far more aggressively than the 2C pathway, but massive uncertainties loom regarding the demand recovery as well as the trajectories of both fossil fuels and renewables.
Read the Full Article
Achieving net-zero emissions can be a complicated feat and requires different strategies for different types of companies. "This isn't just a pie-in-the-sky commitment or announcement. This is something that we spent a lot of time researching and analyzing and studying," DTE Gas Co. President and COO Matt Paul said of the company's plan to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 in an exclusive interview with ESG Insider, an S&P Global podcast about environmental, social, and governance issues.
Listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Low Carbon Credit
Climate change induced by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been argued to pose a serious threat to life on earth. Over the past few years, it has become a hot topic of debate among governments, central banks, and regulators due to possible business disruptions and, potentially, financial losses. This may also lead to further detrimental consequences, ranging from a slowdown of a country’s economic output to increased unemployment to financial market instability.
Since the 2015 Paris Agreement, 180+ countries have committed to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy by enacting a variety of policies. This includes the introduction or increase of a carbon tax. Major central banks and financial regulators across the world are planning to test the financial markets’ preparedness for associated physical and transition risks by introducing ad-hoc scenarios to financial institutions’ annual stress-testing exercises.
While scenario analysis is routinely performed by risk managers at financial institutions and non-financial corporations, energy transition risks pose new challenges. This includes the longer time horizons needed for the analysis, the scarcity of quality company emission data, and the lack of an established quantitative approach linking energy transition risks and opportunities to credit risk.
Climate Credit Analytics
Climate change has created a need to evaluate the impact of different climate-related scenarios on counterparties, investments, and portfolios. To support these efforts, S&P Global Market Intelligence and Oliver Wyman present Climate Credit Analytics, a climate scenario analysis and credit analytics model suite. These tools combine S&P Global Market Intelligence’s data resources and credit analytics capabilities with Oliver Wyman’s climate scenario and stress-testing expertise.
Differentiated Data and Analytics
Climate Credit Analytics translates climate scenarios into drivers of financial performance tailored to each industry, such as production volumes, fuel costs, and capex spending. These drivers are then used to forecast complete company financial statements under various climate scenarios, including those published by the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), a group of over 60 central banks and supervisors.
This will enable users to have comprehensive and consistent sector-specific modelling, including key high carbon-emitting sectors. The tool leverages S&P Global Market Intelligence’s proprietary datasets and capabilities, including financial and industry-specific data, sophisticated quantitative credit scoring methodologies, and company-level data from Trucost and Panjiva.Learn more about Climate Credit Analytics
The coronavirus pandemic may accelerate a shift from fossil fuel spending to investments in renewable energy, but the pace of that transition depends heavily on how governments direct economic recovery spending, and whether the consumer behavior changes induced by the outbreak become permanent.
Listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other platforms.
The landmark Paris Agreement marked a sea change in the global fight against climate change. Backed by empirical evidence from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ambition has since grown to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C since pre-industrial levels.
To date, climate-conscious investors have largely focused on reducing relative portfolio carbon exposure, but divergent methodologies have made fertile ground for so-called “greenwashing.” While point-in-time analyses do not necessarily inform alignment with our needed transition to a low-carbon economy. However, a combination of groundbreaking new datasets and index innovation is emerging. Investors now have the choice to align with a scenario that may mitigate the most catastrophic impacts. The European Union (EU) is in the process of finalizing standards for defining a ClimateTransition Benchmark (CTB) and a Paris-aligned Benchmark (PAB), both of which use absolute measures to align with a 1.5°C trajectory rather than simply a relative carbon reduction.
S&P PACT™ Indices: Empowering Investors Looking to Align with a 1.5°C Scenario
How can indices provide greater insight into climate risk and help investors looking to go beyond traditional carbon reduction strategies?Take a Closer Look
360° of Climate – Indices for Every Objective
There is a pressing need for the world to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to decrease the risks and impacts of climate change. Responsible action is required by all stakeholders, including investors.Read the Full Article
The S&P 500® ESG Index: Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance Values into the Core
The S&P 500 ESG Index aligns investment objectives with environmental, social, and governance values. It can serve as a benchmark as well as the basis for index-linked investment products.Read the Full Article
ESG InFocus is a monthly newsletter from S&P Global Market Intelligence that captures news, insights, trends, and commentary into ESG developments driving change across business decisions. Stay informed on upcoming ESG related webinars, conferences, and networking events.Subscribe to the Newsletter
Greenhouse gas emissions are expected to dip this year due to fallout from the pandemic that has plunged economies the world over into recession. S&P Global Platts Analytics estimates global GHG emissions will drop 5.5% this year.
That would be the largest drop since 1.4% in 2008 during the global financial crisis, according to the Global Carbon Project. That's significant but would still fall short of the 7.6% each year in reductions that the UN Environment Program says the planet needs to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius under the Paris Agreement.
Furthermore, climate watchers expect a rebound in emissions growth once economies restart and try to make up for lost time. This means companies and countries will still need to reduce their emissions further. To be sure, many are committing to becoming "net zero" by 2050, which is in line with the agreement, but is it achievable? Can they really reduce as many emissions as they produce? Here, in this article, we assess the ability of the world's forests and soils to capture carbon and offset emissions.
- Net-zero commitments by companies and countries remain critical to mitigating climate change, even though GHG emissions are falling this year, not least because they are expected to rebound.
- Capturing CO2 in forests and agricultural soils has the maximum potential to offset 32%-47% of annual CO2 emissions. Biosequestration has the potential to offset approximately 26%-37% of annual global GHG emissions. The offset values could be worth $125 billion-$150 billion for a total market of $175 billion-$250 billion a year, roughly the size of the green bond market.
- Supply for soil-related carbon offset markets could likely come from projects in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the region has larger area of agricultural land to store carbon and low national emissions. Historically, the supply has mostly come from the U.S. Demand for offsets will come from the larger emitting countries.
- However, markets for forest- and soil-based offsets face obstacles such as stagnation in the climate change negotiations, uncertainty about measuring offsets, and wildfires.
Future of Hydrogen
Hydrogen is a fuel for the future, but its use is already well established. To harness its potential to decarbonize energy systems and create a real hydrogen economy, large-scale investments are needed.
Click to read Powerful Molecules
Infographic: Sustainable hydrogen: blue and green pathways to decarbonization
Close to 80% of the world's hydrogen production is derived from natural gas (gray hydrogen), 20% from coal or lignite (black or brown hydrogen), the remainder from electrolysis of water (green hydrogen if renewable power is used).
Read the Full Article
Derided, doubted, and now celebrated—an old solution to fossil fuels has become the fuel of tomorrow. Simon Thorne and Roman Kramarchuk of S&P Global Platts join the Essential Podcast with host Nathan Hunt to explain the practicalities and obstacles for hydrogen as an energy carrier.
Listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, and our podcast page .
How Are the Leaders Leading?
The commitments of governments, regions, and cities across the globe to reduce carbon emissions are creating transformative times for many industries. Few are facing more change than the global power sector, which is responsible for approximately one-quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is expected that renewable electricity will need to increase to 70-85% of supplies by 2050 in order to limit climate change to less than 1.5°C of warming to avoid its worst impacts, with coal-fired power being almost completely eliminated.
A Need for Leadership
Given its size and effect, it is important that the global power sector play a key role in the world’s decarbonization efforts. To recognize progress made on this front, Trucost developed a methodology to identify power companies at the forefront of the energy transition for the S&P Global Platts3 Global Energy Awards; The Energy Transition Award.
The short list of ten power companies included: Contact Energy, E.ON, EDP-Energias de Portugal, Enel, ENGIE, Iberdrola, Ørsted, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, SSE, Sempra Energy, VERBUND, and Xcel Energy.
These companies shared the following traits:
–Demonstrate exemplary performance among peers in terms of current GHG impacts.
–Have been reducing their impact over time.
–Have published goals to meet the objects of the Paris Agreement to keep a global temperature rise well below 2°C from pre-industrial levels.
–Show a lower impact on potential earnings from a rising carbon price.